ПРЕПРИНТ
О результатах, изложенных в препринтах, не следует сообщать в СМИ как о проверенной информации.
The article is devoted to a comprehensive description of memefication as a relatively new social practice in the digital culture of participation. Special attention is paid to the construction and deconstruction of memes as compact remixes that perform the function of ironic judgments about current events and problems in the post-truth era.
Ponomarev N. P. 2025. Memefication, generation of memes, and deconstruction of memes. PREPRINTS.RU. https://doi.org/10.24108/preprints-3113549
1. Adam J-M., Bonhomme M. La argumentation publicitaria. Madrid: Catedra, 2009.
2. Allcott H., Gentzkow M. Social media and fake news in the 2016 election // Journal of economic perspectives. 2017. Vol. 31 (2). P. 211-236. doi:10.1257/jep.31.2.211
3. Allen G. Intertextuality. London: Routledge, 2000.
4. Aral S., Walker D. Creating social contagion through viral product design: A randomized trial of peer influence in networks // Management science. 2011. Vol. 57 (9). P. 1623-1639.
5. Barton M.H., Stein K.A., Church S.H. The disruptive power of memes: The carnivalesque and Kevin Spacey's Place in the Weinstein moment // Relevant rhetoric. 2020. Vol. 11. P. 1-21.
6. Baudrillard J. Simulations. N.Y.: Semiotext(e), 1983.
7. Baym G., Shah C. Circulating struggle: The on-line flow of environmental advocacy clips from The Daily Show and The Colbert Report // Information, communication, and society, 2011. P. 1017-1038.
8. Berger J. Beyond viral: Interpersonal communication in the internet age // Psychological inquiry. 2014. Vol. 24. P. 293-296.
9. Berger J., Milkman K.L. What makes online content viral? // Journal of marketing research. 2012. Vol. 49 (2). P. 192-205. doi:10.1509/jmr.10.0353
10. Best European Fiction / ed. A. Hemon. Dublin: Dalkey Archive Press, 2009.
11. Bolter J.D., Grusin R.R. Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1999.
12. Bulatovic M. The imitation game: The memefication of political discourse // European views. 2019. Vol. 18 (2). P. 250-253. doi: 10.1177/1781685819887691
13. Burroughs B. Obama trolling: Memes, salutes and an agonistic politics in the 2012 presidential election // The fibreculture journal: Trolls and the negative space of the Internet. 2013. Vol. 22 (165).
14. Calixto D. Memes na internet: Entrelacamentos entre educomunicacao, cibercultura e a 'zoeira' de estudantes nas redes sociais. Dissertacao de Mestrado. Sao Paulo: Universidade de Sao Paulo, 2017.
15. Campanelli V. Toward a remix culture: An existential perspective // The Routledge companion to remix studies / ed. E. Navas, O. Gallagher, X. Burrough. N.Y.: Routledge, 2015. P. 68-82.
16. Carrigan T. New apples tempt business // PC User. 27.09.1989.
17. Carter J. Enchanting memes: Memetic politics in the face of technocratic control. Doctor's Dissertation. University of Nebraska, 2016. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/commstuddiss/40
18. Chagas V., Freire F., Rios D., Magalhaes D. Political memes and the politics of memes: A methodological proposal for content analysis of online political memes // First Monday. 2019. Vol. 24 (2-4). https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/rt/printerFriendly/7264/7731
19. Christopher R. The meme is dead, long live the meme // Post memes: Seizing the memes of production / ed. A. Bown, E.D. Bristow. Punctum books, 2019. P. 31-44.
20. Dancygier B., Lieven. Internet memes as multimodal constructions // Cognitive linguistics. 2017. Vol. 28 (3). P. 565-598. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2017-0074.
21. Dawkins R. The God Delusion. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2006.
22. Dawkins R. The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976.
23. de Kosnik A. Rogue archives: Digital cultural memory and media fandom. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2016.
24. De Leon F.M.G. The rise of meme culture: Examining the language of memes as a satirical tool to promote sociopolitical awareness // English Language Studies. 15 December 2017. University of Santo Tomas Espana, Manila.
25. de Saint Laurent C., Glaveanu V.P., Literat I. Making sense of refugees on social media: Perspective-taking, political imagination, and Internet memes // American behavioral scientist. 2018. Vol. 62 (4). P. 440-457.
26. de Seta G. Digital folklore // Second International Handbook of Internet Research / ed. J. Hunsinger, M. Allen, L. Klastrup. Dordrecht: Springer. 2020. P. 167-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1555-1_36
27. Dean J. Sorted for memes and Gifs: Visual media and everyday digital politics // Political studies review. 2019. Vol. 17 (3). P. 255-266. DOI: 10.1177/1478929918807483
28. Deus E.P., Campos R.D., Rocha A.R. Memes as shortcut to consumer culture: A methodological approach to covert collective ideologies // Revista de Administragao Contemporanea. 2022. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac202221C005
29. Donovan J. How memes got weaponized: A short history. MIT Technology Review. October 24, 2019. https://www.technologvreview.com/2019/10/24/132228/political-war-memes-disinformation
30. Duncombe S. Dream: Re-imagining progressive politics in an age of fantasy. N.Y.: New Press, 2007.
31. Fairclough N. Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.
32. Falconer R. The new polymath (Remixing Knowledge) // The Routledge Companion to Remix Studies / ed. E. Navas, O. Gallagher, X. Burrough. N.Y.: Routledge, 2015. P. 397-408.
33. Falero S.M. Digital participatory culture and the TV audience. Everyone's a critic. Fullerton: Palgrave McMillan, 2016. doi:10.1057/978-1-137-50000-7
34. Ferrada Stoehrel R., Lindgren S. For the Lulz: Anonymous, aesthetics, and affect // TripleC - communication, capitalism and critique, 2014. Vol. 12 (1). P. 238-264.
35. Ferrari R. Pepe the Frog: Participatory culture, and the sociopolitical significance of memes. College writing: Intensive. 9 December 2016. https://edspace.american.edu/rf5440b/wp- content/uploads/sites/760/2016/09/Memes-paper.pdf
36. Galip I. Methodological and epistemological challenges in meme research and meme studies // Digital technology, culture and society. 2024. Vol. 8 (4). P. 312-330. DOI: 10.1080/24701475.2024.2359846
37. Garda Lopez F., Martinez Cardama S. Strategies for preserving memes as artefacts of digital culture // Journal of librarianship and information science. 2020. Vol. 52 (3). P. 895-904. doi:10.1177/0961000619882070
38. Gee J.P. Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. N.Y.: Routledge, 2004.
39. Gibson W. God's little toys // Wired. 2005. Vol. 13 (7).
40. Gillespie T. The relevance of algorithms // Media technologies. Essays on communication, materiality, and society / ed. Ed. T. Gillespie, P.J. Boczkowski, K.A. Foot. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2014. P. 167-194.
41. Greenberg C. Avant-garde and kitsch // Partisan review. 1939 (Fall).
42. Haköngägas E., Halmesvaara O., Sakki I. Persuasion through bitter humor: Multimodal discourse analysis of rhetoric in internet memes of two far-right groups in Finland // Social media + society. 2020. P. 1-11. DOI: 10.1177/2056305120921575
43. Hayden-Roy P.A. On parasitic discourse in Till Eulenspiegel: Can we take it seriously? // Lesarten: New methodologies and old texts / ed. A. Schwarz. Bern: Peter Lang, 1990. P. 79-87.
44. Heiskanen B. Meme-ing electoral participation // European Journal of American Studies. 2017. Vol. 12 (2).
45. Highfield T., Leaver T. Instagrammatics and digital methods: Studying visual social media, from selfies and GIFs to memes and emoji // Communication research and practices. 2016. Vol. 2 (1). P. 47-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2016.1155332.
46. Howard P.N. Lie machines: How to save democracy from troll armies, deceitful robots, junk news operations, political operatives. Yale University Press, 2020.
47. Hristova S. Visual memes as neutralizers of political dissent //tripleC: Communication Capitalism and Critique. 2014. Vol. 12 (1). P. 265-276. DOI:10.31269/triplec.v12i1.507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1421
48. Huntington H. Subversive memes: Internet memes as a form of visual rhetoric // Selected papers of Internet research 14.0, Denver, USA, 2013.
49. Huntington H.E. The affect and effect of Internet memes: Assessing perceptions and influence of online user-generated political discourse as media. Doctor Dissertation. Colorado State University, 2017.
50. Iedema R. Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice // Visual communication. 2003. Vol. 2 (1). P. 29-57.
51. Illouz E., Gilon D., Shachak M. Emotions and cultural theory // Handbook of the sociology of emotions. Vol. II /ed. J.E. Stets, J.H. Turner. N.Y.: Springer, 2014. P. 221-244.
52. Jakobson R. Linguistics and poetics // Style in language / ed. T. Sebeok. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1960. P. 350-377.
53. Jakobson R. On linguistic aspects of translation // On translation / ed. R. Brower. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1959. P. 232-239.
54. Jameson F. Postmodernism and consumer society // The anti-aesthetic: Essays on postmodern culture / ed. H. Foster. Port Townsend Bay Press, 1982. P. 111-125.
55. Jenkins H., Li X., Krauskopf A.D., Green J. If it doesn't spread, it's dead. Creating value in a spreadable marketplace. 2010.
56. Kennedy G.A. Classical rhetoric and its Christian and secular tradition from ancient to modern times. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1987.
57. Kingsmith A.T. Why so serious? Framing comedies of recognition and repertoires of tactical frivolity within social movements // A journal for and about social movements. 2016. Vol. 8 (2). P. 286-310.
58. Kristeva J. Word, dialogue, and novel // Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art / ed. L. Roudiez. N.Y.: Columbia University Press, 1986. P. 64-91.
59. Kustritz A.M. Seriality and transmediality in the fan multiverse: Flexible and multiple narrative structures in fan fiction, art, and vids // TV/Series. Vol. 6. P. 225-261. https://doi.org/10.4000/tvseries.331
60. Lash S. Sociology of postmodernism. London: Routledge, 1990.
61. Levy N. The bad news about fake news // Social epistemology review and reply collective. 2017. Vol. 6 (8). P. 20-36.
62. Lieback H. Truth-telling and trolls: Trolling, political rhetoric in the twenty-first century, and the objectivity norm // Aspeers. 2019. Vol. 12. P. 9-36. DOI: 10.54465/aspeers.12-03
63. Lymarev A. The secret third thing. A pragmatic analysis of post-irony and post-ironic internet memes. Master thesis. University of Oslo, 2023.
64. Manovich L. Remix strategies in social media // The Routledge companion to remix studies / ed. E. Navas, O. Gallaghe, X. Burrough. N.Y.: Routledge, 2015. P. 135-153.
65. Markham A.N. Bricolage // Keywords in remix studies / ed. E. Navas, O. Gallagher, X. Burrough. N.Y.: Routledge, 2018. P. 43-55.
66. Markham A.N. Remix cultures, remix methods: Reframing qualitative inquiry for social media contexts // Global dimensions of qualitative inquiry / ed. N.K. Denzin, M.D. Giardina. Walnut Creek: Routledge Left Coast Press, 2013. P. 63-81.
67. Marx G.T. Surveillance and society // Encyclopedia of social theory / ed. G. Ritzer. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2004. P. 275-280.
68. McCandless D. Information is beautiful. London: Collins, 2010.
69. McKelvey F., DeJong S., Frenzel J. Memes, scenes and #ELXN2019s: How partisans make memes during elections // New media and society. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211020690
70. Nagle A. Kill all normies: Online culture wars from 4chan and Tumblr to Trump and the alt-right. John Hunt Publishing, 2017.
71. Nikolajeva M., Scott C. The dynamics of picture book communication // Children's literature in education. 2000. Vol. 31. P. 225-239.
72. Nissenbaum A., Shifman L. Meme templates as expressive repertoires in a globalizing world: A cross-linguistic study // Journal of computer-mediated communication. 2018. Vol. 23. P. 294-310.
73. Noelle-Neumann E. The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion // Journal of communication. 1974. Vol. 24 (2). P. 43-51.
74. Orinx K., Struye de Swielande T. China and cognitive warfare: Why is the West losing? // Cognitive warfare: The future of cognitive dominance / ed. B. Claverie, B. Prebot, N. Beuchler, F. du Cluzel. NATO Collaboration Support Office. 2022. P. 8-1 - 8-7.
75. Palagret C-A. Influence de l'art sur la publicite: Citations et detournements // Art et publicite. 28 Mars 2008. http://palagret.eklablog.com/influence-de-l-art-sur-la-publicite-citations-et-detournements-a114822912
76. Penney J. It's so hard not to be funny in this situation»: Memes and humor in US youth online political expression // Television and new media. 2020. Vol. 21 (8). P. 791-806.
77. Peters C., Allan S. Weaponizing memes: The journalistic mediation of visual politicization // Digital journalism. 2022. Vol. 10 (2). P. 217-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1903958
78. Peterson M.A. Performing media: Towards an ethnography of intertextuality // Media anthropology / ed. E. Rothenbuler, M. Coman. London: SAGE Publications, 2005. P. 129-138.
79. Piata A. Stylistic humor across modalities. The case of classical art memes // Internet pragmatics. 2019. Vol. 3. P. 174-201. https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00031.pia
80. Porter M.J., Larson D.L., Harthcock A., Nellis K.B. Re(de)fining narrative events: Examining television narrative structure // Journal of popular film and television. 2002. Vol. 30. P. 23-30.
81. Poster C. A Historicist recontextualization of the enthymeme // Rhetoric society quarterly. 1992. Vol. 22 (2). P. 1-24.
82. Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants. Part 1 // On the horizon. 2001. Vol. 9 (5). P. 1-6. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
83. Prochazka O. Internet memes – A new literacy? // Ostrava journal of English philology. 2014. Vol. 6 (1). P. 53-74.
84. Raessens J. Playful identities, or the ludification of culture // Games and culture. 2006. Vol. 1 (1). P. 52-57.
85. Riedel A.S., Weeks C.S., Beatson A.T. Am I intruding? Developing a conceptualisation of advertising intrusiveness // Journal of marketing management. 2018. Vol. 34 (9-10). P. 750-774. doi: 10.1080/0267257X.2018.1496130
86. Rochat A. US president 2.0 or how netizens use memes to remix politics: From pre-election discourse to its critique through textual carnivalesque. These de doctorat. University of Lausanne, 2019. http://serval.unil.ch
87. Ross A.S., Rivers D.J. Digital cultures of political participation: Internet memes and the discursive delegitimization of the 2016 U.S. presidential candidates // Discourse, context and media. 2017. Vol. 16. P. 111.
88. Sartwell C. Appropriation // Encyclopedia of Aesthetics. Vol. 1 / ed. M. Kelly. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 1998. P. 68-70.
89. Schiele J. Dank memes and visual discourse. Bachelor Thesis. University of Groningen, 2017.
90. Schwartz H. The culture of the copy. N.Y.: Zone, 1996.
91. Searle I.R. Speech acts, mind and social reality // Speech acts, mind and social reality: Discussions with John R. Searle / ed. G. Grewendorf, G. Meggle. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 2002. P. 3-16.
92. Segev E., Nissenbaum A., Stolero N., Shifman L. Families and networks of internet memes: The relationship between cohesiveness, uniqueness, and quiddity concreteness// Journal of computer-mediated communication. 2015. Vol. 20. P. 417-433.
93. Seiffert-Brockmann J., Diehl T., Dobusch L. Memes as games: The evolution of a digital discourse online // New media and society. 2018. Vol. 20 (8). P. 2862-2879. DOI: 10.1177/1461444817735334
94. Shifman L. Memes in digital culture. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2014.
95. Sim S. Retro // The Routledge companion to postmodernism / ed. S. Sim. N.Y.: Routledge, 2005.
96. Singer P.W., Brooking E.T. Like war: The weaponization of social media. Boston: Mariner Books, 2019.
97. Smith C.A. Weaponized iconoclasm in Internet memes featuring the expression fake news // Discourse and communication. 2019. Vol. 13 (3). P. 303-319.
98. Spitzberg B.H. Toward a model of meme diffusion (M3D) // Communication theory. 2014. Vol. 24 (3). P. 311339. doi:10.1111/comt.12042
99. Stone D.A. Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas // Political science quarterly. 1989. Vol. 104 (2). P. 281-300.
100. Sturken M., Cartwright L. Practices of looking: An introduction to visual culture. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 2001.
101. Suler J.R. The online disinhibition effect // CyberPsychology and behavior. 2004. Vol. 7 (3). P. 321-326.
102. Suryawanshi S., Chakravarthi B.R., Varma P., Arcan M., McCrae J.P., Buitelaar P. A dataset for troll classification of TamilMemes // Proceedings of the WILDRE5 – 5th Workshop on Indian Language Data: Resources and Evaluation. P. 7-13. Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC 2020), Marseille, 11-16 May 2020.
103. Tay G. Binders full of LOLitics: Political humour, internet memes, and play in the 2012 U.S. presidential election (and beyond) // European journal of humour research. 2014. Vol. 2 (4).
104. Thibault M. Do not talk about anonymous: Censura, autocensura e anonimato nelle periferie del Web // Lexia. 2016. Vol. 21-22. P. 237-254.
105. Torres E.C. The intertextuality of works of art in advertising // Advertising and society review. 2015. Vol. 16 (3). P. 4-12.
106. Wagener A. Hypernarrativity, storytelling, and the relativity of truth: Digital semiotics of communication and interaction // Postdigital science and education. 2020. Vol. 2 (1). P. 147-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438- 019-00066-7
107. Walker R. Political cartoons: Now you see them // Canadian parliamentary review. 2003. Vol. 26 (1). P. 16-21.
108. Welsh M.T. Disruptive rhetoric in age of outrage. Doctor’s Dissertation. Austin: The University of Texas, 2020.
109. White E.B. Preface // A subtreasury of American humor / ed. E.B. White, K.S. White. N.Y.: Coward-McCann, 1941.
110. Wiggins B.E, Bowers G.B. Memes as genre: A structurational analysis of the memescape // New media and society. 2014. Vol. 17 (11). P. 1886-1906.
111. Wiggins B.E. The discursive power of memes in digital culture. Ideology, semiotics, and intertextuality. N.Y.: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, 2019.
112. Yankoski M., Scheirer W., Weninger T. Meme warfare: AI countermeasures to disinformation should focus on popular, not perfect, fakes // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 2021. Vol. 77 (3). P. 119-123. DOI: 10.1080/00963402.2021.1912093
113. Yus F. Multimodality in memes: A cyberpragmatic approach // Analyzing digital discourse: New insights and future directions / ed. P. Bou-Franch, P. Garces-Conejos Blitvich. Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. P. 105-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92663-6
114. Zappavigna M. Discourse of Twitter and social media: How we use language to create affiliation on the Web. London: Bloomsbury, 2012.
115. Bart R. Udovol'stvie ot teksta // Bart R. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Poetika. M., 1989. C. 462-518.
116. Bahtin M.M. Voprosy literatury i estetiki. Issledovaniya raznyh let. M., 1975.
117. Bahtin M.M. Problema rechevyh zhanrov // Bahtin M.M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva. M. 1979. S. 237¬280.
118. Denikin A.A. K opredeleniyu termina «participaciya» v kontekste sovremennyh hudozhestvennyh praktik // Nauka televideniya. 2018. №14 (1). S. 58-79.
119. Karasik V.I., Slyshkin G.G. Tendencii razvitiya sovremennogo diskursa. Aktual'nye problemy filologii i pedagogicheskoj lingvistiki. 2021. №1. C. 14-31.DOI: https://doi.org/10.29025/2079-6021-2021-1-14-31
120. Levi-Stros K. Nepriruchennaya mysl' // Levi-Stros K. Pervobytnoe myshlenie. M. 1962. S. 111-336.
121. Mol' A. Hudozhestvennaya futurologiya. K roli kitcha i kopii v social'no-esteticheskom razvitii // Borev V.YU., Kovalenko A.V. Kul'tura i massovaya kommunikaciya. M., 1986. S. 259-297.
122. Ortega-i-Gasset H. Vosstanie mass. M., 2003.
123. Ponomarev N.F. Postmodernistskie strategicheskie kommunikacii. Postpravda. Memy. Transmedia: monografiya. M., 2020.
124. Shomova S.A. Mem-letopisec: reprezentaciya novostnoj povestki dnya pandemii v memeticheskom kontente runeta // Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny. 2021. № 5. S. 399-424. https:// doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2021.5.1977
125. Shomova S.A. Razvlekat' i vlastvovat': obrazy rossijskoj vlasti i oppozicii v internet-memah // Vestn. Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 10. ZHurnalistika. 2019. № 3. S. 23-41.
