1. Abidin C., Kaye D.B.V. Audio memes, earworms, and templatability: the aural turn of memes on TikTok // Critical meme reader: Global mutations of the viral image. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures. 2021. P. 58-68.

2. Adler A., Fromer J.C. Memes on memes and the new creativity // New York University Law Review. 2022. Vol. 97.

3. Barton M.H., Stein K.A., Church S.H. The disruptive power of memes: The carnivalesque and Kevin Spacey’s place in the Weinstein moment // Relevant rhetoric. 2020. Vol. 11. P. 1-21.

4. Baumbach N. Sameness-machines: On the political unconscious of memes // Representations. 2024. Vol. 168 (1). P. 153-169. Doi: 10.1525/rep.2024.168.1.1

5. Best S., You M., Young D.R. Meme aesthetics // Representations. 2024. Vol. 168 (1). P. 1-23. Doi: 10.1525/rep.2024.168.1.1

6. Chang H-C.H., Shaman B., Chen Y., Zha M., Noh S., Wei C., Weener T., Magee M. Generative Memesis: AI Mediates Political Memes in the 2024 United States Presidential Election // Program in Quantitative Social Science, Dartmouth College, NH USA 03755. Department of Mathematics, Dartmouth College, NH USA 03755

7. Cohen T. Metaphor and the cultivation of intimacy // Critical inquiry. 1978. Vol. 5. P. 3-12

8. Coulson S., Fauconnier G. Fake guns and stone lions: Conceptual blending and privative adjectives // Cognition and function in language / ed. B. Fox, D. Jurafsky, L. Michaelis. Palo Alto: The Center for the Study of Language and Information, 1999. P. 143-158.

9. De Long J.B., Shleifer A., Summers L.H., Waldmann R.J. Noise trader risk in financial markets // Journal of political economy. 1990. Viol. 98 (4). P. 703-738

10. De Seta G. Digital folklore // Second international handbook of internet research / ed. J. Hunsinger, M.M. Allen, L. Klastrup. Springer Netherlands, 2020. P. 167-183. Https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1555-1 36

11. De Seta G. An algorithmic folklore: Vernacular creativity in times of everyday automation // Critical Meme Reader III. INC Reader #17. Breaking the meme / ed. C. Arkenbout, I. Galip. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures, 2024. P. 233-253.

12. Dingsun T., Marrs L. The Lore Zone: 9999. 2021. Https://otherinter.net/research/lore/9999/

13. Douglas N. It’s supposed to look like shit: The Internet ugly aesthetic // Journal of visual culture. 2014. Vol. 13 (3). P. 314-339. Https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412914544516

14. Falconer R. The new polymath (Remixing Knowledge) // The Routledge Companion to Remix Studies / ed. E. Navas, O. Gallagher, X. Burrough. N.Y.: Routledge, 2015. P. 397-408.

15. Homans C. When political memes take on a lie of their own // New York Times. 13 September 2024.

16. Huang J., Thornton K.M., Efthimiadis E.N. Conversational tagging in Twitter // HT'10: Proceedings of the 21st ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia. 13 June 2010. P. 173-178. Https://doi.org/10.1145/1810617.1810647

17. Introne J., Gokce Yildirim I., Landoli L., Decook J., Elzeini S. How people weave online information into pseudoknowledge // Social media + society. 2018. Vol. 4 (3). Https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118785639

18. Katz Y., Shifman L. Making sense? The structure and meanings of digital memetic nonsense // Information, communication and society. 2017. Vol. 20 (6). P. 825-842. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1291702

19. Kincheloe J.L. On to the next level: Continuing the conceptualization of the bricolage // Qualitative inquiry. 2005. Vol. 11 (3). P. 323-350.

20. Asprem E. The magical theory of politics: Memes, magic, and the enchantment of social forces in the American magic war // Nova Religio: The journal of alternative and emergent religions. 2020. Vol. 23 (4). P. 15-42.

21. Lantagne S.M. Mutating internet memes and the amplification of copyright’s authorship challenges // Virginia sports and entertainment law journal. 2017. Vol. 17.

22. Lariviere J. The just kidding jouissance of Dark Brandon // Representations. 2024. Vol. 168 (1). P. 170-179. Doi: 10.1525/rep.2024.168.1.1

23. Lessig L. Remix: Making art and commerce thrive in the hybrid economy. N.Y.: Penguin Press, 2008.

24. Lialina O., Espenschied D. (ed.). Digital folklore. Stuttgart: Merz and Solitude, 2009.

25. Lippmann W. Public opinion. N.Y.: Free Press Paperbacks, 1922.

26. Literat I., van den Berg S. Buy memes low, sell memes high: Vernacular criticism and collective negotiations of value on Reddit's Meme Economy // Information, communication and society. 2019. Vol. 22 (2). P. 232-249. DOI:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1366540

27. Lovink G., Tuters M. They say we can’t meme: politics of idea compression // Institute of Network Cultures. 11 February 2018. Http:// networkcultures.org/geert/2018/02/11/they-say-we-cant-meme-politics-of-idea-compression-geert-lovink-marc-tuters/.

28. Malik K. Trump’s fantasy that migrants are eating cats proves the meme has prevailed over real politics // Guardian. 15 September 2024.

29. Memes as an online weapon. An analysis into the use of memes by the far right. National Coordinator for Security and Counterterrorism (NCTV). May 2024. Https://english.nctv.nl/binaries/nctv-en/documenten/publications/2024/08/01/far-right-memes-undermining-and-far-from-recognizable/NCTV_Memes+as+an+online+weapon_English+version+May+2024.pdf

30. Mihailescu M-G. Never mess with the memers: How meme creators are redefining contemporary politics // Social media + Society. 2024. P. 1-18. DOI: 10.1177/20563051241296256

31. Miltner K.M. Internet memes // The SAGE handbook of social media / ed. J. Burgess, A. Marwick, T. Poell. London: SAGE Publications, 2018. P. 412-428. Https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781473984066.n23

32. Mitman T., Denham J. Into the meme stream: The value and spectacle of Internet memes // New media and society. 29 January 2024. Https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241227843

33. Parry K. A theory of assembly: From museums to memes. University of Minnesota Press, 2023.

34. Peters C., Allan S. Weaponizing memes: The journalistic mediation of visual politicization // Digital journalism. 2022. Vol. 10 (2). P. 217-229. Https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1903958

35. Peterson M.A. Performing media: Towards an ethnography of intertextuality // Media anthropology / ed. E. Rothenbuler, M. Coman. London: SAGE Publications, 2005. P. 129-138.

36. Procházka O. A chronotopic approach to identity performance in a Facebook meme page // Discourse, context and media. 2018. Vol. 25. P. 78-87.

37. Rochat A. US president 2.0 or how netizens use memes to remix politics: From pre-election discourse to its critique through textual carnivalesque. Thèse de doctorat. University of Lausanne, 2019. Http://serval.unil.ch

38. Škoro I.E., Bril M. AI can't meme?! How I learned to stop worrying and love AI memes // Critical Meme Reader III. INC Reader #17. Breaking the meme / ed. C. Arkenbout, I. Galip. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures, 2024. P. 264-271.

39. Smith N., Copland S. Memetic moments: The speed of Twitter memes // Journal of digital social research. 2022. Vol. 4 (1). P. 23-48. Https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814535194.

40. Spencer P. Trump’s occult online supporters believe ‘meme magic’ got him elected // Motherboard. 18 November 2016. Https:// motherboard. Vice. Com/ en_us / article / pgkx7g / trumps - occult - online - supporters - believe - pepe - meme - magic- got - him – elected

41. Steyerl H. In defense of the poor image // e-flux journal. 2009. Vol. 10. P. 1-9.

42. Tormakhova A., Tovmash D., Grechkosii R. The influence of artistic kitsch on the formation of political memes // the Slovak journal of aesthetics. 2024. Vol. 13 (2). P. 117-145. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14772442.

43. Torres E.C. The intertextuality of works of art in advertising // Advertising and society review. 2015. Vol. 16 (3). P. 4-12.

44. Waysdorf A.S. Remix in the age of ubiquitous remix // Convergence: The international journal of research into new media technologies. 2021. Vol. 27 (4). P. 1129-1144.

45. Yue G. Chatbodies // Representations. 2024. Vol. 168 (1). P. 180-201. Doi: 10.1525/rep.2024.168.1.1