Given publication provides a clear and exhaustive grounding the mission of human memory as the base of self-awareness, erudition and full-fledged creative activism. Well in a separate line, the transient attention is also paid to the extremal capabilities of a person which ordinarily fall under the category of fringe science (hypercalculia, phenomenon of Shereshevsky, versatile work-performance etc.). But the most important thing is that in his theoretical research the author makes one more (both for domestic philosophers and humanitarians on the whole) brave attempt to penetrate into the secret depths of spiritualized nature, mentally scanning the intracellular space and revealing thus complex evolutionary mechanism of programmed operating the central nervous system. And generally the content of this article could be reproduced in six short points: 1) Human memory functions on several levels, and primary, which inherent to the dominating thalamus, is immediately conditioned by the current perception (or, say, early childhood imprinting). 2) In the process of long-term memory formation, the principal role is given by us to histone macro-molecules and astrocytes, not to the network architectonics of the cortex (as most of purblind overseas naturalists mistakenly believe). 3) Astrocytes are capable of acting except the role of passive memory keepers in this case; and, plus to that, carry apparently an analog, not a digital code (i.e. are as though a pocket-book for a lecturer or museum exhibits for a historian). 4) Unlike long-term, instant memory, being directly related to apprehension, imbibes totally all sensory information entering the brain and, in addition, is preserved forever - regardless of any traumas or illnesses. But in everyday life, it’s extremely hard to claim it, since for this we need to penetrate in the integrative field of the primal “Ego”. 5) If sensations arise at once - as a mirror reaction to an object, then emotions do only after checking with hereditary memory, that is, a little are quasi delayed. Wherein specific ”drawing” the adequate type of sensitivity is realized downright at the degree of the congruent thalamic nucleus - without even reaching the Self-substrate. 6) Formal logic’s conceptual apparatus can be considered as somewhat simplified model of numerous working structures and communications existing in the cortex. Well, and besides, nearly from the very introductory section, here it’s raised another not unimportant block of questions relating to a quite heterodox opinion that all live organisms (and among them, of course, a person) by no means are divine creatures but plain bio-robots. Moreover this leitmotif runs like a red thread across the entire authorial narration. So ultimately the idea about the inevitability of the dictatorship of mind presented in the conclusion seems to a reader as pretty argued and comprehensively reasonable!