In recent years, with the adroit hand of three nimble yankees: S.Perlmutter, A.Riess and B.Schmidt - almost the whole world community was suddenly fired up by very outlandish for many (though erstwhile unfamiliar) problem of dark energy and dark matter. Whereas for natural philosophers there is nothing enigmatic about it. Especially when you consider that multilayer ignored by modern science is inherent not only in habitual biological bodies, but also in crystals (possessing at least two supplementary sheaths) and even in some evolutionarily advanced planets. Though, undoubtedly, the bulk of dark matter falls on Universe noosphere (known, by the way, to Buddhists under the name kāma-lokya, to Mohammedans as al-A'raf and to Catholics as purgatory). And regarding dark energy, it is rather a kind of quasi-anthropic paradox that depends entirely on a stay of observing subject. After all, on the periphery of topologically closed Universe, any sober observer, by and large, won’t just find a single dark erg or even an extra electron-volt. However, besides those clearly contrived pseudo-riddles, in his article the author undertakes to debunk (or, at least, slightly "to ground”) one more disturbing our minds the eternal cosmic mystery associated with the phenomenon of “magnum silentium universi”. It's no secret that traditionally many contemporary researchers-positivists (and, in particular, trans-oceanic) for its solving have tried to appeal to the notorious Drake equation. That is, from their point of view, if by the most moderate standards, a good dozen of highly developed extraterrestrial cultures should be within the Milky Way but there is not a single of them so far - then it ostensibly indicates the etiological complexity, i.e. the nonlinearity of the paths "from inert - to living". Meanwhile in practice, given circumstance can unless testify to the fact usual Laplace-Cartesian justification here, alack, does not work. And this accordingly leads either to postulating an advantageous location of our home planet near the very isthmus of the hyperverse, or a certain orderliness of space exploration (what per definitionem requires some almighty Scheduler’s immediate creative participation). Wherein it ought to remark that both these arguments are quite corresponding to basic ideas of the Roman Catholic Church. In short, the appropriate conclusion suggests here itself: when unraveling the most difficult outlook problems of the existence, it is obviously better to trust philosophers rather than naturalists or techies!