Эта статья является препринтом и не была отрецензирована.
О результатах, изложенных в препринтах, не следует сообщать в СМИ как о проверенной информации.
1. Anderson N.H. Integration theory and attitude change // Psychological review. 1971. Vol. 78 (3). P. 171-206.
2. Ariel M. The demise of a unique concept of literal meaning // Journal of pragmatics. 2002. Vol. 34 (4). P. 361-402.
3. Ariel M. Pragmatics and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
4. Austin J.L. How to do things with words. London: Oxford University Press, 1962.
5. Barton M.H., Stein K.A., Church S.H. The disruptive power of memes: The carnivalesque and Kevin Spacey’s place in the Weinstein moment // Relevant rhetoric. 2020. Vol. 11. P. 1-21.
6. Bell D. Innuendo // Journal of pragmatics. 1997. Vol. 27 (1). P. 35-59.
7. Bertuccelli Papi M. Implicitness in text and discourse. Pisa: ETS, 2000.
8. Blume A., Board O. Intentional vagueness // Erkenntnis. 2013. Vol. 79 (S4). P. 1-45.
9. Camp E. Insinuation, common ground, and the conversational record // New work on speech acts / ed. D. Fogal, D. W. Harris, M. Moss. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. P. 40-66.
10. Cap P. Pragmatics, micropragmatics, macropragmatics // Lodz papers in pragmatics. 2010. Vol. 6.2. P. 195-228.
11. Dominguez Armas A., Soria Ruiz A. Provocative insinuations // Daimon Revista Internacional de Filosofia. 2021. Vol. 84. Article 84.
12. Eco U. A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1979.
13. Eisenberg E.M. Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication // Communication monographs. 1984. Vol. 51 (3). P. 227-242.
14. Fricker E. Stating and insinuating // Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 2012. Vol. S86 (1). P. 61-94.
15. Garric N., Longh J. Atteindre l’Interdiscours par la circulation des discours et du sens // Langage et societe. 2013. Vol. 144 (2). P. 65-83.
16. Iedema R. Multimodality, resemioticization: Extending the analysis of discourse as a multisemiotic practice // Visual communication. 2003. Vol. 2 (1). P. 29-57.
17. Jandric P., Knox J., Besley T., Ryberg T., Suoranta J., Hayes S. Postdigital science and education // Educational philosophy and theory. 2018. Vol. 50 (10). P. 893-899.
18. Jewitt C. Multimodal analysis // The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication / ed. A. Georgakopoulou, T. Spilioti T. Abingdon: Routledge, 2015. P. 69-84.
19. Johnson C.R. Illocutionary relativism // Synthese. 2023. Vol. 202 (3). P. 1-18.
20. Lee J.J., Pinker S. Rationales for indirect speech: The theory of the strategic speaker // Psychological review. 2010. Vol. 117 (3). P. 785-807.
21. Lewiński M. Illocutionary pluralism // Synthese. 2021. Vol. 199 (3-4). P. 6687-6714.
22. Macagno F., Capone A. Uncommon ground // Intercultural pragmatics. 2016. Vol. 13 (2). P. 151-180.
23. Mey J.L. Pragmatics: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001.
24. Moeschler J. Is a speaker-based pragmatics possible? Or how can a hearer infer a speaker's commitment? // Journal of pragmatics. 2013. Vol. 48. P. 84-97.
25. O’Halloran K.L. Multimodal discourse analysis // Bloomsbury companion to discourse analysis / ed. K. Hyland, B. Paltridge, L. Wong. London: Bloomsbury, 2021. P. 249-266.
26. Panther K-U. Introduction to cognitive pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 2022.
27. Rescher N. Presumption and the practices of tentative cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
28. Saul J. Dogwhistles, political manipulation, and philosophy of language // New work on speech acts / ed. D. Fogal, D.W. Harris, M. Moss. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. P. 360-383.
29. Sperber D., Wilson D. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1986.
30. Sperber D., Wilson D. Irony and relevance: A reply to drs. Seto, Hamamoto and Yamanashi // relevance theory: Applications and implications / ed. R. Carston, S. Uchida. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 1998. P. 283-293.
31. Sperber D., Wilson D. A deflationary account of metaphors // The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought / ed. R.W. Gibbs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. P. 84-105.
32. Stalnaker R. Pragmatic presuppositions // Semantics and philosophy / ed. M. Munitz, P. Under. N.Y.: New York University Press, 1974. P. 197-213.
33. Stalnaker R. Complex predicates // The Monist. 1977. Vol. 60 (3). P. 327-339.
34. Stalnaker R. Common ground // Linguistics and philosophy. 2002. Vol. 25. P. 701-721.
35. Stöckl H. Sprache-Bild-Texte lesen. Bausteine zur Methodik einer Grundkompetenz // Bildlinguistik. Theorien-Methoden-Fallbeispiele / ed. H. Diekmannshenke et al. Berlin: Erich Schmidt, 2011. P. 45-70.
36. Strawson P.F. Intention and convention in speech acts // The philosophical review. 1964. Vol. 73 (4). P. 439-460.
37. Wagener A. The postdigital emergence of memes and gifs: Meaning, discourse, and hypernarrative creativity // Postdigital science and education. 2021. Vol. 3. P. 831-850.
38. Wilson D., Sperber D. Explaining irony // Meaning and relevance / ed. D. Wilson, D. Sperber. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. P. 123-145.
39. Witek M. Mechanisms of illocutionary games // Language and communication. 2015. Vol. 42. P. 11-22.
40. Witek M. Illocution and accommodation in the functioning of presumptions // Synthese. 2021. Vol. 198 (7). P. 6207-6244.
41. Zanette M.C., Blikstein I., Visconti L.M. Intertextual virality and vernacular repertoires: Internet memes as objects connecting different online worlds // Revista de administraqao de empresas. 2019. Vol. 59 (3). P. 157-169.
