1. Aharoni T. When high and pop culture (re)mix: An inquiry into the memetic transformations of artwork // New media and society. 2019. Vol. 21 (10). P. 2283-2304.

2. Anderson N.H. Integration theory and attitude change // Psychological review. 1971. Vol. 78 (3). P. 171-206.

3. Ariel M. Privileged interactional interpretations // Journal of pragmatics. 2002. Vol. 34 (8). P. 1003-1044.

4. Bell A., Ensslin A. I know what it was. You know what it was. Second-person narration in hypertext fiction // Narrative. 2011. Vol. 19 (3).

5. Boudana S., Frosh P., Cohen A.A. Reviving icons to death: When historic photographs become digital memes // Media, culture and society. 2017. Vol. 39 (8). P. 1210-1230.

6. Brooks L.R., Hannah S.D. Instantiated features and the use of rules // Journal of experimental psychology: General 2006. Vol. 135 (2). P. 133-151.

7. Bullot N., Reber R. The artful mind meets art history: Toward a psycho-historical framework for the science of art appreciation // Behavioral and brain sciences. 2013. Vol. 36 (2). P. 123-137.

8. Bushanskyi V. Postmodern kitsch narcissism // Scientific Notes of I.F. Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. 2011.

9. Calinescu M. Five faces of modernity: Modernism, avant-garde, decadence, kitsch, postmodernism. Durham: Duke University Press, 1987.

10. Campbell J. Allusions and Illusions // French studies bulletin. 1994. Vol. 15 (53). P. 18-20.

11. Cohen T. Jokes // Pleasure, preference and value: Studies in philosophical aesthetics / ed. E. Schaper. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983. P. 124-129.

12. Cohen T. Metaphor and the cultivation of intimacy // Critical inquiry. 1978. Vol. 5. P. 3-12.

13. Delicath J.W., De Luca K.M. Image events, the public sphere, and argumentative practice: The case of radical environmental groups // Argumentation. 2003. Vol. 17. P. 315-333.

14. Derecho A. Archontic literature. A definition, a history, and several theories of fan fiction // Fan fiction and fan communities in the age of the Internet: New essays / ed. K. Hellekson, K. Busse. London: McFarland and Company, 2006. P. 61-78.

15. Dingsun T., Marrs L. The Lore Zone: 9999. 2021. https://otherinter.net/research/lore/9999/

16. Douglas N. It’s supposed to look like shit: The Internet ugly aesthetic // Journal of visual culture. 2014. Vol. 13 (3). P. 314-339.

17. Egenter R. Kitsch und Christenleben. Chicago: Franciscan Herald Press, 1967.

18. Fahlenbrach K. Net icons and memetic imagery of protest in online activism // Visual communication. 29 January 2025.

19. Fauconnier G., Turner M. The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities. N.Y.: Basic Books, 2002.

20. Fielitz M., Staemmler D. Hashtags, tweets, protest? Varianten des digitalen Aktivismus // Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen. 2020. Vol. 33 (2). P. 425-441.

21. Garmendia J. The clash: Humor and critical attitude in verbal irony // Humor: International journal of humor research. 2014. Vol. 27 (4). P. 641- 659.

22. Graf L.K.M., Landwehr J.R. Aesthetic pleasure versus aesthetic interest: The two routes to aesthetic liking // Frontiers in psychology. 2017. Vol. 8:15. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00015

23. Greenberg C. Avant-garde and kitsch // Clement Greenberg: The collected essays and criticism. Vol. 1. Perceptions and judgments, 1939-1944 / ed. J. O’Brian. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986. P. 5-22.

24. Haapanen L., Perrin D. Linguistic recycling: The process of quoting in increasingly mediatized settings // AILA Review. 2020. Vol. 33. P. 1-20.

25. Hale A. There is an after-life (for jokes, anyway): The potential for, and appeal of, ‘immortality’ in humour // Humour: International journal of humour research. 2018. Vol. 31 (3). P. 507-538.

26. Hariman R., Lucaites J.L. No caption needed: Iconic photographs, public culture, and liberal democracy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2007.

27. Hartle S., White D. (eds.). Visual activism in the 21st century: Art, protest and resistance in an uncertain world. London: Bloomsbury, 2022.

28. Hellgren E. Translation of allusions in the animated cartoon the Simpsons. Thesis. University of Helsinki, 2007.

29. Irwin W. The aesthetics of allusion // The journal of value inquiry. 2002. Vol. 36. P. 521-532.

30. Irwin W. What is an allusion? // Journal of aesthetics and art criticism. 2001. Vol. 59 (3). P. 287-297.

31. Iser W. Prospecting: From reader response to literary anthropology. London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989.

32. Kjeldsen J. Visual rhetorical argumentation // Semiotica. 2017. Vol. 220. P. 69-94.

33. Kjellman-Chapin M. The politics of kitsch, rethinking Marxism // A journal of economics, culture and society. 2010. Vol. 22 (1). P. 27-41.

34. Kundera M. The unbearable lightness of being. London: Faber and Faber, 1999.

35. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.

36. Leder H., Belke B., Oeberst A., Augustin D. A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments // British journal of psychology. 2004. Vol. 95. P. 489-508.

37. Lou A. Multimodal simile: The ‘when’ meme in social media discourse // English text construction. 2017. Vol. 10 (1). P. 106-131.

38. Luis J., Razo M. The Greenberg paradox: The effects of modernism and kitsch in contemporary art. 9 December 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1584568

39. Marwick A.E., boyd d. Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media // New media and society. 2014. Vol. 16. P. 1051-1067.

40. Ngai S. Our aesthetic categories: Zany, cute, interesting. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2012.

41. Perlmutter D.D. Hypericons: Famous news images in the internet-satellite-digital age. Digital media: Transformations in human communication / ed. P. Messaris, L. Humphreys. N.Y.: Peter Lang, 2006. P. 51-66.

42. Perri C. On alluding // Poetics. 1978. Vol. 7. P. 289-307.

43. Piata A. Stylistic humor across modalities. The case of classical art memes // Internet pragmatics. 2019. Vol. 3. P. 174-201.

44. Pucci J. The full-knowing reader: Allusion and the power of the reader in the Western literary tradition. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998.

45. Rogers R.A. From cultural exchange to transculturation: A review and reconceptualization of cultural appropriation // Communication theory. 2006. Vol. 16. P. 474-450.

46. Russo J.L. User-penetrated content: Fan video in the age of convergence // Cinema journal. 2009. Vol. 48 (4). P. 125-130.

47. Schankweiler K. Bildproteste. Widerstand im Netz. Berlin: Wagenbach, 2019.

48. Schonig J. Liking as creating: On aesthetic category memes // New media and society. 2020. Vol. 22 (1). P. 26-48.

49. Sibley F. Aesthetic concepts // The philosophical review. 1959. Vol. 68 (4). P. 421-450.

50. Sontag S. Notes on camp // Camp: Queer aesthetics and the performing subject / ed. F. Cleto. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1964. P. 53-65.

51. Thibault M., Marino G. Who run the world? Cats: Cat lovers, cat memes, and cat languages across the Web // International journal for the semiotics of law. 2018. Vol. 31. P. 473-490.

52. Tormakhova A., Tovmash D., Grechkosii R. the influence of artistic kitsch on the formation of political memes // the Slovak journal of aesthetics. 2024. Vol. 13 (2). P. 117-145. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14772442.

53. Valotka A. Allusion in a nutshell // Lietuviu kalba. 2016. Vol. 10.

54. Wagener A. The postdigital emergence of memes and gifs: Meaning, discourse, and hypernarrative creativity // Postdigital science and education. 2021. Vol. 3. P. 831-850.

55. Warburg A.M. Mnemosyne: Zwischen Evolutionstheorie und Bilderatlas // Warburg A.M. Werke in einem Band. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 1929. P. 615-647.

56. Wiggins B.E. The discursive power of memes in digital culture. Ideology, semiotics, and intertextuality. N.Y.: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, 2019.

57. Wodak R. Friend or foe: The defamation or legitimate and necessary criticism? Reflections on recent political discourse in Austria // Language and communication. 2002. Vol. 22. P. 495-517.

58. Zuckerman E. The Cute Cat Theory // Talk at ETech. 8 March 2008. https://ethanzuckerman.com/2008/03/08/the-cute-cat-theory-talk-at-etech/