1. Adam J-M., Bonhomme M. La argumentation publicitaria. Madrid: Catedra, 2009.

2. Anspach W., Coe K., Thurlow C. The other closet? Atheists, homosexuals and the lateral appropriation of discursive capital // Critical discourse studies. 2007. Vol. 4. P. 95-119.

3. Beer D. Power through the algorithm? Participatory web cultures and the technological unconscious // New media and society. 2009. Vol. 11 (6). P. 985-1002.

4. Berger L-J., Freeman M.J. The issue of relevance of agenda-setting theory to the online community // Meta-communicate. 2011. Vol. 1(1). https://journals.chapman.edu/ojs/index.php/mc/article/view/267

5. Bessi A., Ferrara E. Social bots distort the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election online discussion // First Monday. 2016. November. doi: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i11.7090.

6. Boyd D. Did media literacy backfire? // Points. 2017. https://points.datasociety.net/did-media-literacy-backfire-7418c084d88d.

7. Burr V. An introduction to social constructionism. N.Y.: Routledge, 1995.

8. Campbell V., Gibson R., Gunter B., Touri M. News blogs, mainstream news and news agendas // Web journalism: A new form of citizenship / ed. S. Tunney, G. Monaghan. Eastbourne: Sussex Academic Press, 2009. P. 29-45.

9. Carr N. The Web shatters focus, rewires brains // Wired. June 2010. http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/05/ff nicholas carr/all/1.

10. Cemiloglu D., Naiseh M., Catania M., Oinas-Kukkonen H., Ali R. The fine line between persuasion and digital addiction // Proceedings of Persuasive Technology: 16th International Conference, Virtual Event, April 12-14, 2021.

11. Cheng C., Li A.Y.-l. Internet addiction prevalence and quality of (real) life: A meta-analysis of 31 nations across seven world regions // Cyberpsychology, behavior, and social networking. 2014. Vol. 17 (12). P. 755-760.

12. Clarke R. Information technology and dataveillance // Communications of the ACM. 1988. Vol. 31 (5). P. 498-512.

13. DeLuca K.M. The speed of immanent images // Visual communication: Perception, rhetoric, and technology / ed. D. Hope. N.Y.: Hampton Press, 2006. P. 79-90.

14. Dynel M. A web of deceit: A neo-Gricean view on types of verbal deception // International review of pragmatics. 2011. Vol. 3. P. 139-167.

15. Fairclough N.L. Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.

16. Fairclough N.L. Media discourse. London: Edward Arnold, 1995.

17. Farrand B. Regulatory capitalism, decentered enforcement and its legal consequences for digital expression: The use of copyright law to restrict freedom of speech online // Journal of information technology and politics. 2013. Vol. 10 (4). P. 404-422.

18. Finnern S. Narration in religious discourse: The example of Christianity // The living handbook of narratology / eds. P. Hühn et al. Hamburg: Hamburg University. URL = http://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de. 08.03.2014.

19. Franck G. The economy of attention // Journal of sociology. 2018. P. 6-18.

20. Gerlitz C., Helmond A. The like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive web // New media and society. 2013. Vol. 15 (8). P. 1348-1365.

21. Gillespie T. The relevance of algorithms // Media technologies. Essays on communication, materiality, and society / ed. Ed. T. Gillespie, P.J. Boczkowski, K.A. Foot. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2014. P. 167-194.

22. Gillespie T. Algorithmically recognizable: Santorum’s Google problem, and Google’s Santorum problem // Information, communication and society. 2017. Vol. 20 (1). P. 63-80.

23. Goldhaber M. The value of openness in an attention economy // First Monday. 2006. Vol. 11. 6-5 June. http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1334/1254

24. Hjarvard S. The mediatization of religion: A theory of the media as agents of religious change // Northern lights 2008. Yearbook of film and media studies. Bristol: Intellect Press, 2008. P. 9-26

25. Illouz E., Gilon D., Shachak M. Emotions and cultural theory // Handbook of the sociology of emotions. Vol. II / ed. J.E. Stets, J.H. Turner. N.Y.: Springer, 2014. P. 221-244.

26. Jenkins H., Ford S., Green J.B. Spreadable media. N.Y.: New York University Press, 2013.

27. Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. N.Y.: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.

28. Katz E., Lazarsfeld P.F. Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Glencoe: Free Press, 1955.

29. Kelly K. Consumed: How markets corrupt children, infantilize adults, and swallow citizens whole (review) // Rhetoric and public affairs. 2009. Vol. 12 (1). P. 152-154.

30. Latour B. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

31. Lavigne F., Denis D. Attentional and semantic anticipations in recurrent neural networks // International Journal of Computing Anticipatory Systems. 2001. Vol. 8. P. 74-95.

32. Leone M. The art of trolling: Semiotic ingredients, sociocultural causes, and pragmatic effects // Virality and morphogenesis of right-wing Internet populism / ed. E. Kimminich, J. Erdmann. N.Y.: Peter Lang, 2018. P. 163-178.

33. MacKinnon R. Consent of the networked: The worldwide struggle for internet freedom. N.Y.: Basic Books, 2012.

34. Marwick A., boyd d. To see and be seen: Celebrity practice on Twitter // Convergence: The international journal of research into new media technologies. 2011. Vol. 17 (2). P. 139-158.

35. Mozdeika L. Nudges, emojis, and memes: Mapping interpassivity theory onto digital civic culture // Communication and democracy. 2023. Vol. 57 (2). P. 252-274.

36. Neuman W.R., Guggenheim L., Mo Jang S., Bae S.Y. The dynamics of public attention: Agenda-setting theory meets big data // Journal of communication. 2014. Vol. 64 (2). P. 193-214.

37. Oinas-Kukkonen H., Haijumaa M. Persuasive systems design: Key issues, process model, and system features // Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 2009. Vol. 24 (1).

38. Palagret C-A. Influence de l'art sur la publicite: Citations et detournements // Art et publicite. 28 Mars 2008. http://palagret.eklablog.com/influence-de-l-art-sur-la-publicite-citations-et-detournements-a114822912

39. Rao A., Spasojevic N., Li Z., Souza T. Klout score: Measuring influence across multiple social networks // Proceedings of Big Data. N.Y.: IEEE, 2015. P. 2282-2289.

40. Rintel S. Crisis memes: The importance of templatability to internet culture and freedom of expression // Australasian journal of popular culture. 2013. Vol. 2 (2). P. 253-271.

41. Rochat A. US president 2.0 or how netizens use memes to remix politics: From pre-election discourse to its critique through textual carnivalesque. Thèse de doctorat. University of Lausanne, 2019. http://serval.unil.ch

42. Rogers R. Operating issue networks on the Web // Science as culture. 2002. Vol. 11 (2). P. 191-213.

43. Rogers R. Otherwise engaged: Social media from vanity metrics to critical analytics // International journal of communication. 2018. Vol. 12. P. 450-472.

44. Senft T. Microcelebrity and the branded self // A companion to new media dynamics / ed. J. Hartley, J. Burgess, A. Bruns. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013. P. 346-354.

45. Silverman C., Alexander L. How teens in the Balkans are duping Trump supporters with fake news // Buzzfeed News. 2016. https://www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilverman/how-macedonia-became-a-global-hub-for-pro-trump-misinfo

46. Simon H.A. Designing organizations for an information rich world // Computers, communications, and the public interest / ed. M. Greenberger. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1971. P. 37-72.

47. Thaler R.H., Sunstein C.R. Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009.

48. Torres E.C. The intertextuality of works of art in advertising // Advertising and society review. 2015. Vol. 16 (3). P. 4-12.

49. Van Leeuwen T. Introducing social semiotics: An introductory textbook. London: Routledge, 2005.

50. Venturini T. From fake to junk news, the data politics of online virality // Data politics: worlds, subjects, rights / ed. D. Bigo, E. Isin, E. Ruppert. London: Routledge, 2019. P. 123-144.

51. Vitali-Rosati M. What is editorialization? // Revue internationale. International Web Journal. 2016/01. http://www.sens-public.org/article1059.html

52. Walsh J.P. Social media and moral panics: Assessing the effects of technological change on societal reaction // International journal of cultural studies. 2020. Vol. 23 (6). P. 840-859.

53. Wortham J. Digital diary: Facebook poke and the tedium of success theater // The New York Times. 28 December 2012.

54. Xing S., Hong J., Wang Y., Chen R., Zhang Z., Grama A., Tu Z., Wang Z. LLMs can get brain rot! Preprint. arXiv:2510.13928v1 [cs.CL] 15 Oct 2025

55. Кибрик А.А. Модус, жанр и другие параметры классификации дискурсов // Вопросы языкознания. 2009. № 2. C. 3-21.