2.Induced Superfluid Cosmology: A Theoretical Framework for Emergent Gravity and Dark Matter V2

Lam Tung Trinh

ПРЕПРИНТ

Эта статья является препринтом и не была отрецензирована.
О результатах, изложенных в препринтах, не следует сообщать в СМИ как о проверенной информации.

2.Induced Superfluid Cosmology: A Theoretical Framework for Emergent Gravity and Dark Matter V2

L. T. Trinh

2026-01-08

https://doi.org/10.24108/preprints-3114225

TRXT-Nullivance V2: Research Extension Summary Abstract: This report (Version 2) presents an extension of the Induced Superfluid Cosmology framework, focusing on the derivation of physical constants from topological boundary conditions. The primary objective of this iteration was to systematize the theoretical model into a 4-layer hierarchy and to rigorously quantify the dependencies between microscopic postulates and macroscopic observables. Summary of Revisions: 1. Theoretical Extension: The 4-Layer Hierarchy We have restructured the model to explicitly distinguish between fundamental postulates and effective field descriptions: Added Layer 0 (Logic Network) to explore a potential resolution to the Cosmological Constant problem via a global "sequestering" mechanism (Reflective Entropy). Clarified the Effective Field Theory (EFT) status of the superfluid condensate, treating gravity as an induced collective phenomenon rather than a fundamental interaction. 2. Methodological Refinement: Mass Spectrum Standardized the derivation of the characteristic scale $M^*$ using only the fine structure constant ($\alpha$) and lepton masses, removing previous free calibration parameters. Explored a specific topological ansatz ($E \sim 1/p + 1/q$) for the boson sector. Preliminary comparison with W and Higgs boson masses shows consistency within current experimental uncertainty. 3. Epistemic Clarifications Open Problems Identified: We explicitly acknowledge that the minimal Self-Interacting Dark Matter (SIDM) model yields a cross-section below astrophysical requirements, indicating the need for an additional enhancement mechanism. Dependency Audit: The reliance on the Vainshtein mechanism for Solar System consistency is now classified as an external dependency rather than an endogenous prediction. Conclusion: This version represents a methodological refinement of the framework, moving from qualitative hypotheses to a more constrained quantitative model with clearly defined theoretical uncertainties.

Ссылка для цитирования:

Trinh L. T. 2026. 2.Induced Superfluid Cosmology: A Theoretical Framework for Emergent Gravity and Dark Matter V2. PREPRINTS.RU. https://doi.org/10.24108/preprints-3114225

Список литературы

1. References

2. [1] Kiefer, C. (2007). Quantum Gravity. Oxford University Press.

3. [2] Sakharov, A. D. (1968). “Vacuum quantum fluctuations in curved space and the theory of

4. gravitation”. Sov. Phys. Dokl. 12, 1040.

5. [3] Volovik, G. E. (2003). The Universe in a Helium Droplet. Oxford University Press.

6. [4] Bardeen, J., Cooper, L. N., & Schrieffer, J. R. (1957). “Theory of Superconductivity”.

7. Phys. Rev. 108, 1175.

8. [5] Particle Data Group (Navas, S. et al.) (2024). “Review of Particle Physics”. Phys. Rev. D

9. 110, 030001.

10. [6] Koide, Y. (1982). “A new formula for the masses of charged leptons”. Lett. Nuovo Cim.

11. 34, 201.

12. [7] Lelli, F. et al. (2016). “SPARC: A High-Quality Rotation Curve Sample”. Astron. J. 152,

13. [8] Vainshtein, A. I. (1972). “To the problem of nonvanishing gravitation mass”. Phys. Lett.

14. B 39, 393.

15. [9] Clowe, D. et al. (2006). “A Direct Empirical Proof of the Existence of Dark Matter”.

16. Astrophys. J. 648, L109.

17. [10] Abbott, B. P. et al. (LIGO/Virgo) (2017). “GW170817: Observation of Gravitational

18. Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101.

19. [11] Riess, A. G. et al. (SH0ES) (2022). “A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value

20. of the Hubble Constant”. Astrophys. J. Lett. 934, L7.

21. [12] KATRIN Collaboration (2022). “Direct neutrino-mass measurement with sub-electronvolt

22. sensitivity”. Nature Phys. 18, 160.

23. [13] LZ Collaboration (2023). “First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN Ex-

24. periment”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041002.

25. [14] XENON Collaboration (2023). “First Dark Matter Search with Nuclear Recoils from the

26. XENONnT Experiment”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041003.

27. [15] CRESST Collaboration (2019). “Results on light dark matter from CRESST-III”. Phys.

28. Rev. D 100, 102002.

29. [16] SuperCDMS Collaboration (2020). “Constraints on low-mass dark matter from Super-

30. CDMS HVeV”. Phys. Rev. D 102, 091101.

31. [17] PandaX-4T Collaboration (2022). “Dark Matter Search Results from the PandaX-4T

32. Commissioning Run”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 121801.

33. [18] CDF Collaboration (2022). “High-precision measurement of the W boson mass with the

34. CDF II detector”. Science 376, 170.

35. [19] ATLAS Collaboration (2024). “Measurement of the W-boson mass in pp collisions at

36. √s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector”. Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 1309. (Note: See also ATLAS-

37. CONF-2023-004 for updated combination.)

38. [20] Nicolis, A., Rattazzi, R., & Trincherini, E. (2009). “The Galileon as a local modification

39. of gravity”. Phys. Rev. D 79, 064036.

40. [21] de Rham, C. (2014). “Massive Gravity”. Living Rev. Relativ. 17, 7.

41. [22] Berezhiani, L. & Khoury, J. (2015). “Theory of dark matter superfluidity”. Phys. Rev. D

42. 92, 103510.

43. [23] Khoury, J. (2016). “Another path for the emergence of modified galactic dynamics from

44. dark matter superfluidity”. Phys. Rev. D 93, 103533.

45. [24] Liberati, S. (2013). “Tests of Lorentz invariance: a 2013 update”. Class. Quantum Grav.

46. 30, 133001.

47. [25] Fermi-LAT Collaboration (2009). “A limit on the variation of the speed of light arising

48. from quantum gravity effects”. Nature 462, 331.

49. [26] Muon g-2 Collaboration (2023). “Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Mag-

50. netic Moment to 0.20 ppm”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 161802.

51. [27] LEP Electroweak Working Group (2006). “Precision electroweak measurements on the Z

52. resonance”. Phys. Rept. 427, 257.

53. [28] Kaloper, N. & Padilla, A. (2014). “Sequestering the Standard Model Vacuum Energy”.

54. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 091304.

55. [29] Planck Collaboration (2020). “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters”. As-

56. tron. Astrophys. 641, A6.

57. [30] Belle II Collaboration (2023). “Search for an invisible Z’ in a final state with two muons

58. and missing energy”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 181801.

59. [31] Tulin, S. & Yu, H.-B. (2018). “Dark Matter Self-interactions and Small Scale Structure”.

60. Phys. Rept. 730, 1.

61. [32] Horndeski, G. W. (1974). “Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-

62. dimensional space”. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 10, 363.

63. [33] Alam, S. et al. (eBOSS Collaboration) (2021). “Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon

64. Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey”. Phys. Rev. D 103, 083533.

65. [34] Bertotti, B., Iess, L., & Tortora, P. (2003). “A test of general relativity using radio links

66. with the Cassini spacecraft”. Nature 425, 374.

67. [35] Spergel, D. N. & Steinhardt, P. J. (2000). “Observational evidence for self-interacting cold

68. dark matter”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3760.

69. 51

ПРЕПРИНТ

ИНФОРМАЦИЯ

Использование куки-файлов