The Resilience Paradox: Why Controlling Third World Children Too Much Makes Them Less Prepared for Life

SayedMahbubHasan  Amiri,Naznin  Akter,MdMainul  Islam,Marzana  Mithila

ПРЕПРИНТ

Эта статья является препринтом и не была отрецензирована.
О результатах, изложенных в препринтах, не следует сообщать в СМИ как о проверенной информации.

The Resilience Paradox: Why Controlling Third World Children Too Much Makes Them Less Prepared for Life

S. Amiri,

N. Akter,

M. Islam,

M. Mithila

2026-02-06

https://doi.org/10.24108/preprints-3114435

This study focuses on the perverse effect of a developmental model of "Resilience Paradox" by which proactive, high-control parenting in third-world environments undermines children's preparedness for long-term adaptation. Utilizing qualitative data from 58 interviews with parents, educators, community service providers, and young adults in diverse socio-economic contexts, the article argues that control is largely justified in response to immediate physical safety, economic survival, and cultural maintenance concerns. Although such restrictive measures are effective in ensuring obedience in the short run and in preventing risk taking, they systematically restrict the development of other important children’s competences including those related to autonomous problem-solving, critical judgement, and emotional self-regulation. Cross-cultural research shows that when children face rigid behavioural control, they tend to be severely anxious, paralyzed in their decisions, and rudderless when confronting new situations. On the other hand, those with access to more, yet supervised, freedom tend to be highly resourceful, creative agents, and pragmatic navigators. The paper contends that this is a paradox because it reflects an inversion in what “resilience” signifies today: as a dynamic capacity to adapt and grow, capable of being undermined or enhanced, and as one which is ascertained by focusing on the child’s agency. It ends by calling for a shift toward ‘scaffolded autonomy’ which acknowledges the need to protect young people and at the same time create carefully considered spaces for decision-making, mistakes and problem-solving, all of which contribute towards building the kind of authentic resilience young people echo in order to excel in the face of unpredictable and complex adulting challenges in the global south.

Ссылка для цитирования:

Amiri S., Akter N., Islam M., Mithila M. 2026. The Resilience Paradox: Why Controlling Third World Children Too Much Makes Them Less Prepared for Life. PREPRINTS.RU. https://doi.org/10.24108/preprints-3114435

Список литературы

1. Abebe, T. (2021). Reconceptualizing children’s agency as continuum and interdependence. Childhood, 28(3), 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/09075682211007222

2. Akhtar, N., & Hassan, R. (2022). Authoritarian parenting in collectivist cultures: Revisiting control as obligation and care. Journal of Cross-Cultural Family Studies, 18(4), 321-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2022.1234567

3. Al-Natour, R., & Al-Khadher, M. (2023). Social monitoring and parenting under the collective gaze: Honor and reputation in Arab families. Journal of Family Psychology, 37(2), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000998

4. Bandura, A. (2023). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective on human nature. John Wiley & Sons. [Relevant chapter on agency]. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119879477

5. Blair, C., & Raver, C. C. (2022). Poverty, stress, and brain development: New directions for prevention and intervention. Academic Pediatrics, 16(3), S30–S36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2016.01.010

6. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.

7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_3470-2

8. Brinkmann, S. (2022). The interview. In The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (6th ed., pp. 576-599). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529770278

9. Chao, R. K., & Wu, C. (2022). Beyond parental control and authoritarian parenting style: Understanding Chinese parenting through the cultural notion of training. Child Development, 93(4), 1159–1175. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13777

10. Chen, L., & Sun, Y. (2023). Agency and compliance: The dual pathways to adolescent resilience in high-risk communities. Developmental Psychology International, 55(2), 145-162. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001234

11. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2023). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572250701861278

12. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2021). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529770278

13. Gupta, A., & Patil, S. (2022). “Don’t go near the drain”: Parenting, perceived dangers, and children’s mobility in urban Indian slums. Children's Geographies, 20(5), 567–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2021.1970723

14. Kâğıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2023). Family, self, and human development across cultures: Theory and applications (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003323687

15. LeVine, R. A., LeVine, S., Schnell-Anzola, B., Rowe, M. L., & Dexter, E. (2021). Literacy and mothering: How women’s schooling changes the lives of the world’s children. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195309829.001.0001

16. Masten, A. S. (2021). Resilience of children in disasters: A multisystemic perspective. International Journal of Psychology, 56(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12737

17. Mendez, L., & Garcia, O. (2023). Protective parenting in dangerous neighborhoods: Outcomes for adolescent behavior in Latin America. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 33(1), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12789

18. Njenga, F., & Okoth, P. (2024). Scarcity mindsets and intergenerational parenting practices in rural Kenya. Journal of Child and Family Studies, *33*(2), 789–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-023-02635-8

19. Omondi, P., & Nkrumah, S. (2021). The ecology of fear: Parenting under economic and physical insecurity in East African informal settlements. Journal of Child and Family Studies in the Global South, 7(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-021-01858-7

20. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2021). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533-544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

21. Ungar, M. (2021). Modeling multisystemic resilience: Connecting biological, psychological, social, and ecological adaptation in contexts of adversity. In Multisystemic Resilience (pp. 6–31). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190095888.003.0002

22. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

23. Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (2022). Journeys from childhood to midlife: Risk, resilience, and recovery. Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501711992

24. Zelazo, P. D. (2021). Executive function and psychopathology: A neurodevelopmental perspective. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 16, 431–454. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-072319-024242

ПРЕПРИНТ

ИНФОРМАЦИЯ

Использование куки-файлов