ПРЕПРИНТ
О результатах, изложенных в препринтах, не следует сообщать в СМИ как о проверенной информации.
Several studies have reported associations of exposures to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (REF) with neoplasia. Other research did not confirm that. Epidemiological research is associated with selection, recall and other bias. A narrative review, analyzing mechanisms, may be more informative than a systematic one, assessing studies of different quality and reliability. A moderate increase of registered incidence reported for some diseases has been out of proportion to the rapid expansion of mobile communication, being explainable by improvements of diagnostics. In some experiments, REF was associated with an increase in some age-related tumors and, at the same time, with a prolonged survival of exposed animals. Thermal and non-thermal effects of REF are analyzed here. In conclusion, there is neither convincing evidence nor theoretic plausibility of a cause-effect relationship between REF and cancer. Reliable evidence can be obtained by large-scale animal experiments. To reduce the cost of experiments, it would suffice to maintain large animal groups in equivalent conditions and to record the life span. Excessively strict safety regulations are unfavorable for the economy.
Яргин С. В. 2026. Health-related effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: an update. PREPRINTS.RU. https://doi.org/10.24108/preprints-3114626
1. Calabrese EJ, Osakabe N, Di Paola R, Siracusa R, Fusco R, D'Amico R (2023) Hormesis defines the limits of lifespan. Ageing Res Rev. 91:102074.
2. Jargin SV (2020) Radiation safety and hormesis. Front Public Health. 8:278.
3. Asanami S, Shimono K (1997) High body temperature induces micronuclei in mouse bone marrow. Mutat Res. 390:79-83.
4. Bunin GR, Robison LL, Biegel JA, Pollack IF, Rorke-Adams LB (2006) Parental heat exposure and risk of childhood brain tumour: a children's oncology group study. Am J Epidemiol. 164:222-231.
5. Komae N, Hibino Y, Sugano N (1999) Analysis of micronuclei induced under hyperthermic conditions in human lymphocyte culture by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and spectral karyotyping (SKY) methods. Yakugaku Zasshi. 119:763-772.
6. Moulin JJ, Wild P, Mantout B, Fournier-Betz M, Mur JM, Smagghe G (1993) Mortality from lung cancer and cardiovascular diseases among stainless-steel producing workers. Cancer Causes Control. 4:75-81.
7. Speit G, Schütz P (2013) Hyperthermia-induced genotoxic effects in human A549 cells. Mutat Res. 747-748:1-5.
8. Stuchly MA (1979) Interaction of radiofrequency and microwave radiation with living systems. A review of mechanisms. Radiat Environ Biophys. 16:1-14.
9. Tenkanen L, Hakulinen T, Hakama M, Saxén E (1985) Sauna, dust and migration as risk factors in lung cancer among smoking and non-smoking males in Finland. Int J Cancer. 35:637-642.
10. Verschaeve L, Juutilainen J, Lagroye I, Miyakoshi J, Saunders R, de Seze R et al (2010) In vitro and in vivo genotoxicity of radiofrequency fields. Mutat Res. 705:252-268.
11. Beltrán-Frutos E, Bernal-Mañas CM, Navarro S, Zuasti A, Ferrer C, Canteras M et al (2012) Histological changes in connective tissue of rat tails after bipolar radiofrequency treatment. Histol Histopathol. 27:1231-1237.
12. Perez FP, Zhou X, Morisaki J, Jurivich D (2008) Electromagnetic field therapy delays cellular senescence and death by enhancement of the heat shock response. Exp Gerontol. 43:307-316.
13. Sun C, Wei X, Fei Y, Su L, Zhao X, Chen G, Xu Z (2016) Mobile phone signal exposure triggers a hormesis-like effect in Atm+/+ and Atm−/− mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Sci Rep. 6:37423.
14. Tsybulin O, Sidorik E, Kyrylenko S, Henshel D, Yakymenko I (2012) GSM 900 MHz microwave radiation affects embryo development of Japanese quails. Electromagn Biol Med. 31:75-86.
15. Cao Y, Tong J (2014) Adaptive response in animals exposed to non-ionizing radiofrequency fields: some underlying mechanisms. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 11:4441-4448.
16. Falone S, Sannino A, Romeo S, Zeni O, Santini SJ, Rispoli R et al (2018) Protective effect of 1950 MHz electromagnetic field in human neuroblastoma cells challenged with menadione. Sci Rep. 8:13234.
17. Ji Y, He Q, Sun Y, Tong J, Cao Y (2016) Adaptive response in mouse bone-marrow stromal cells exposed to 900-MHz radiofrequency fields: gamma-radiation-induced DNA strand breaks and repair. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 79:419-426.
18. Meena JK, Verma A, Kohli C, Ingle GK (2016) Mobile phone use and possible cancer risk: current perspectives in India. Indian J Occup Environ Med. 20:5-9.
19. SCENIHR (2015) Opinion on potential health effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 36:480-484.
20. Sienkiewicz Z, Calderón C, Broom KA, Addison D, Gavard A, Lundberg L, Maslanyj M (2017) Are exposures to multiple frequencies the key to future radiofrequency research? Front Public Health. 5:328.
21. Danese E, Lippi G, Buonocore R, Benati M, Bovo C, Bonaguri C et al (2017) Mobile phone radiofrequency exposure has no effect on DNA double strand breaks (DSB) in human lymphocytes. Ann Transl Med. 5:272.
22. Gläser K, Rohland M, Kleine-Ostmann T, Schrader T, Stopper H, Hintzsche H (2016) Effect of radiofrequency radiation on human hematopoietic stem cells. Radiat Res. 186:455-465.
23. Silva V, Hilly O, Strenov Y, Tzabari C, Hauptman Y, Feinmesser R (2016) Effect of cell phone-like electromagnetic radiation on primary human thyroid cells. Int J Radiat Biol. 92:107-115.
24. Speit G, Gminski R, Tauber R (2013) Genotoxic effects of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) in HL-60 cells are not reproducible. Mutat Res. 755:163-166.
25. Simkó M, Remondini D, Zeni O, Scarfi MR (2016) Quality matters: systematic analysis of endpoints related to "Cellular Life" in vitro data of radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 13(7):701.
26. Vijayalaxmi, Prihoda TJ (2019) Comprehensive review of quality of publications and meta-analysis of genetic damage in mammalian cells exposed to non-ionizing radiofrequency fields. Radiat Res. 191:20-30.
27. Herrala M, Mustafa E, Naarala J, Juutilainen J (2018) Assessment of genotoxicity and genomic instability in rat primary astrocytes exposed to 872 MHz radiofrequency radiation and chemicals. Int J Radiat Biol. 94:883-889.
28. Lerchl A, Klose M, Grote K, Wilhelm AF, Spathmann O, Fiedler T et al (2015) Tumour promotion by exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields below exposure limits for humans. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 459:585-590.
29. Black DR, Heynick LN (2003) Radiofrequency (RF) effects on blood cells, cardiac, endocrine, and immunological functions. Bioelectromagnetics. (Suppl 6):S187-SS95.
30. Bua L, Tibaldi E, Falcioni L, Lauriola M, De Angelis L, Gnudi F et al (2018) Results of lifespan exposure to continuous and intermittent extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields (ELFEMF) administered alone to Sprague Dawley rats. Environ Res. 164:271-279.
31. Foster KR, Glaser R (2007) Thermal mechanisms of interaction of radiofrequency energy with biological systems with relevance to exposure guidelines. Health Phys. 92:609-620.
32. Verschaeve L (2005) Genetic effects of radiofrequency radiation (RFR). Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 207(2 Suppl):336-341.
33. IARC (2013) Working group on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Non-ionizing radiation, part 2: radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 102:1-460.
34. Tillmann T, Ernst H, Streckert J, Zhou Y, Taugner F, Hansen V, Dasenbrock C (2010) Indication of cocarcinogenic potential of chronic UMTS-modulated radiofrequency exposure in an ethylnitrosourea mouse model. Int J Radiat Biol. 86(7):529-541.
35. Adams JA, Galloway TS, Mondal D, Esteves SC, Mathews F (2014) Effect of mobile telephones on sperm quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Int. 70:106-112.
36. Johnson EE, Kenny RPW, Adesanya AM, Richmond C, Beyer F, Calderon C et al (2024) The effects of radiofrequency exposure on adverse female reproductive outcomes: A systematic review of human observational studies with dose-response meta-analysis. Environ Int. 190:108816.
37. Kenny RPW, Johnson E, Adesanya AM, Richmond C, Beyer F, Calderon C et al (2024) The effects of radiofrequency exposure on male fertility: A systematic review of human observational studies with dose-response meta-analysis. Environ Int. 190:108817.
38. Kesari KK, Agarwal A, Henkel R (2018) Radiations and male fertility. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 16:118.
39. Cordelli E, Ardoino L, Benassi B, Consales C, Eleuteri P, Marino C et al (2023) Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field (RF-EMF) exposure on pregnancy and birth outcomes: A systematic review of experimental studies on non-human mammals. Environ Int. 180:108178.
40. Cordelli E, Ardoino L, Benassi B, Consales C, Eleuteri P, Marino C et al (2024) Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure on male fertility: A systematic review of experimental studies on non-human mammals and human sperm in vitro. Environ Int. 185:108509.
41. Michaelson SM, Lin JC (1987) Biological effects and health implications of radiofrequency radiation. Plenum press, New York and London.
42. Melnick RL, Moskowitz JM, Héroux P, Mallery-Blythe E, McCredden JE, Herbert M et al (2025) The WHO-commissioned systematic reviews on health effects of radiofrequency radiation provide no assurance of safety. Environ Health. 24(1):70.
43. Anderson V, Rowley J (2007) Measurements of skin surface temperature during mobile phone use. Bioelectromagnetics. 28:159-162.
44. NTP (2018) National Toxicology Program technical report on the toxicology and carcinogenesis studies in HSD: Sprague Dawley rats exposed to whole-body radio frequency radiation at a frequency (900 MHz) and modulations (GSM and CDMA) used by cell phone. Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser. 595:1-380.
45. Yan JG, Agresti M, Bruce T, Yan YH, Granlund A, Matloub HS (2007) Effects of cellular phone emissions on sperm motility in rats. Fertil Steril. 88:957-964.
46. FCC (2025) Federal Communications Commission. Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) for Cellular Telephones. https://www.fcc.gov/general/specific-absorption-rate-sar-cellular-telephones
47. Falcioni L, Bua L, Tibaldi E, Lauriola M, De Angelis L et al (2018) Report of final results regarding brain and heart tumours in Sprague-Dawley rats exposed from prenatal life until natural death to mobile phone radiofrequency field representative of a 1.8 GHz GSM base station environmental emission. Environ Res. 165:496-503.
48. Soffritti M, Giuliani L (2019) The carcinogenic potential of non-ionizing radiations: the cases of S-50 Hz MF and 1.8 GHz GSM radiofrequency radiation. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 125(Suppl 3):58-69.
49. ICNIRP (2018) International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) Note on recent animal carcinogenesis studies. https://www.icnirp.org/cms/upload/publications/ICNIRPnote2018.pdf
50. Mevissen M, Ducray A, Ward JM, Kopp-Schneider A, McNamee JP, Wood AW et al (2025) Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure on cancer in laboratory animal studies, a systematic review. Environ Int. 199:109482.
51. Wyde ME, Horn TL, Capstick MH, Ladbury JM, Koepke G, Wilson PF et al (2018) Effect of cell phone radiofrequency radiation on body temperature in rodents: pilot studies of the National Toxicology Program's reverberation chamber exposure system. Bioelectromagnetics. 39:190-199.
52. Baan R, Grosse Y, Lauby-Secretan B, El Ghissassi F, Bouvard V, Benbrahim-Tallaa L et al (2011) Carcinogenicity of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Lancet Oncol. 12:624-626.
53. Sienkiewicz Z, van Rongen E, Croft R, Ziegelberger G, Veyret B (2016) A closer look at the thresholds of thermal damage: workshop report by an ICNIRP task group. Health Phys. 111:300-306.
54. NTP (1999) National Toxicology Program toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of 60-HZ magnetic fields in F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice (whole-body exposure studies). Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser. 488:1-168.
55. NTP (2018) National Toxicology Program technical report on the toxicology and carcinogenesis studies in B6C3F1/N mice exposed to whole-body radio frequency radiation at a frequency (1800 MHz) and modulation (GSM and CDMA) used by cell phones. Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser. 596:1-258.
56. ICNIRP (2020) International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) Note: critical evaluation of two radiofrequency electromagnetic field animal carcinogenicity studies published in 2018. Health Phys. 118:525-532.
57. Grigoriev YG, Samoylov AS, Bushmanov AY, Khorseva NI (2017) Cellular connection and the health of children - problem of the third millennium. Med Radiol Radiation Safety. 62:39-46.
58. Guerriero F, Ricevuti G (2016) Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields stimulation modulates autoimmunity and immune responses: a possible immuno-modulatory therapeutic effect in neurodegenerative diseases. Neural Regen Res. 11:1888-1895.
59. King MA, Clanton TL, Laitano O (2016) Hyperthermia, dehydration, and osmotic stress: unconventional sources of exercise-induced reactive oxygen species. Am J Phys Regul Integr Comp Phys. 310:R105-R114.
60. Gius D, Mattson D, Bradbury CM, Smart DK, Spitz DR (2004) Thermal stress and the disruption of redox-sensitive signalling and transcription factor activation: possible role in radiosensitization. Int J Hyperth. 20:213-223.
61. Giorgio M (2015) Oxidative stress and the unfulfilled promises of antioxidant agents. Ecancermedicalscience. 9:556.
62. Carlberg M, Hardell L (2017) Evaluation of mobile phone and cordless phone use and glioma risk using the Bradford hill viewpoints from 1965 on association or causation. Biomed Res Int. 2017:9218486.
63. Carpenter DO (2010) Electromagnetic fields and cancer: the cost of doing nothing. Rev Environ Health. 25:75-80.
64. Davis DL, Kesari S, Soskolne CL, Miller AB, Stein Y (2013) Swedish review strengthens grounds for concluding that radiation from cellular and cordless phones is a probable human carcinogen. Pathophysiology. 20:123-129.
65. Morgan LL, Miller AB, Sasco A, Davis DL (2015) Mobile phone radiation causes brain tumours and should be classified as a probable human carcinogen (2A) (review). Int J Oncol. 46:1865-1871.
66. Hardell L, Carlberg M, Söderqvist F, Mild KH (2013) Case-control study of the association between malignant brain tumours diagnosed between 2007 and 2009 and mobile and cordless phone use. Int J Oncol. 43:1833-1845.
67. Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson MK (2013) Use of mobile phones and cordless phones is associated with increased risk for glioma and acoustic neuroma. Pathophysiology. 20:85-110.
68. Söderqvist F, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild K, Hardell L (2011) Childhood brain tumour risk and its association with wireless phones: a commentary. Environ Health. 10:106.
69. Yang L, Hao D, Wang M, Zeng Y, Wu S, Zeng Y (2012) Cellular neoplastic transformation induced by 916 MHz microwave radiation. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 32:1039-1046.
70. Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson MK (2011) Pooled analysis of case control studies on malignant brain tumours and the use of mobile and cordless phones including living and deceased subjects. Int J Oncol. 38:1465-1474.
71. Alexiou GA, Sioka C (2015) Mobile phone use and risk for intracranial tumours. J Negat Results Biomed. 14:23.
72. Inskip PD, Tarone RE, Hatch EE, Wilcosky TC, Shapiro WR, Selker RG et al (2001) Cellular-telephone use and brain tumours. N Engl J Med. 344: 79-86.
73. Muscat JE, Malkin MG, Thompson S, Shore RE, Stellman SD, McRee D et al (2000) Handheld cellular telephone use and risk of brain cancer. JAMA. 284:3001-3007.
74. Schüz J, Ahlbom A (2008) Exposure to electromagnetic fields and the risk of childhood leukaemia: a review. Radiat Prot Dosim. 132:202-211.
75. Vila J, Turner MC, Gracia-Lavedan E, Figuerola J, Bowman JD, Kincl L et al (2018) Occupational exposure to high-frequency electromagnetic fields and brain tumor risk in the INTEROCC study: an individualized assessment approach. Environ Int. 119:353-365.
76. Yoon S, Choi JW, Lee E, An H, Choi HD, Kim N (2015) Mobile phone use and risk of glioma: a case-control study in Korea for 2002-2007. Environ Health Toxicol. 30:e2015015.
77. INTERPHONE (2010) Study Group. Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study. Int J Epidemiol. 39:675-694.
78. Grell K, Frederiksen K, Schüz J, Cardis E, Armstrong B, Siemiatycki J et al (2016) The intracranial distribution of gliomas in relation to exposure from mobile phones: analyses from the INTERPHONE study. Am J Epidemiol. 184:818-828.
79. Momoli F, Siemiatycki J, McBride ML, Parent MÉ, Richardson L, Bedard D et al (2017) Probabilistic multiple-bias modeling applied to the Canadian data from the Interphone study of mobile phone use and risk of glioma, meningioma, acoustic neuroma, and parotid gland tumours. Am J Epidemiol. 186:885-893.
80. Cardis E, Armstrong BK , Bowman JD, Giles GG, Hours M, Krewski D et al (2011) Risk of brain tumours in relation to estimated RF dose from mobile phones: results from five Interphone countries. Occup Environ Med. 68:631-640.
81. Inskip PD, Hoover RN, Devesa SS (2010) Brain cancer incidence trends in relation to cellular telephone use in the United States. Neuro-Oncology. 12:1147-1151.
82. Little MP, Rajaraman P, Curtis RE, Devesa SS, Inskip PD, CheckDP, Linet MS (2012) Mobile phone use and glioma risk: comparison of epidemiological study results with incidence trends in the United States. BMJ. 344:e1147.
83. Nilsson J, Järås J, Henriksson R, Holgersson G, Bergström S, Estenberg J et al (2019) No evidence for increased brain tumour incidence in the Swedish National Cancer Register between years 1980-2012. Anticancer Res. 39:791-796.
84. Miranda-Filho A, Piñeros M, Soerjomataram I, Deltour I, Bray F (2017) Cancers of the brain and CNS: global patterns and trends in incidence. Neuro-Oncology. 19:270-280.
85. Gittleman HR, Ostrom QT, Rouse CD, Dowling JA, de Blank PM, Kruchko CA et al (2015) Trends in central nervous system tumour incidence relative to other common cancers in adults, adolescents, and children in the United States, 2000 to 2010. Cancer. 121:102-112.
86. Philips A, Henshaw DL, Lamburn G, O'Carroll MJ (2018) Brain tumours: rise in glioblastoma multiforme incidence in England 1995-2015 suggests an adverse environmental or lifestyle factor. J Environ Public Health. 2018:7910754.
87. ICNIRP (2025) International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) Gaps in knowledge relevant to the "Icnirp guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields (100 kHz TO 300 GHz)". Health Phys. 128(2):190-202.
88. Swerdlow AJ, Feychting M, Green AC, Leeka Kheifets LK, Savitz DA (2011) International Commission for Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection Standing Committee on Epidemiology. Mobile phones, brain tumours, and the interphone study: where are we now? Environ Health Perspect. 119:1534-1538.
89. ICNIRP Note (2021) Response to: John William Frank “Electromagnetic Fields, 5G and Health: What About the Precautionary Principle?” J Epidemiol Community Health 2021. https://www.icnirp.org/cms/upload/publications/ICNIRPNoteMay2021.pdf
90. Vrijheid M, Deltour I, Krewski D, Sanchez M, Cardis E (2006) The effects of recall errors and of selection bias in epidemiologic studies of mobile phone use and cancer risk. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 16:371-384.
91. Schüz J, Jacobsen R, Olsen JH, Boice JD Jr, McLaughlin JK, Johansen C (2006) Cellular telephone use and cancer risk: update of a nationwide Danish cohort. J Natl Cancer Inst. 98:1707-1713.
92. Nikolaevskaia VP (1966) The use of microwave therapy in patients with chronic tonsillitis. Vestn Otorinolaringol. 6:31-34.
93. Povazhnaia EL, Mambetalieva AS (2010) Extremely high frequency therapy for the prevention of acute respiratory diseases in children with chronic ENT and allergic diseases. Vopr Kurortol Fizioter Lech Fiz Kult. 5:17-21.
94. GOST (2005) 28603-90 Apparatus for short-wave therapy. General technical requirements and test methods. Moscow, Standartinform. (In Russian)
95. Leitgeb N, Omerspahic A, Niedermayr F (2010) Exposure of non-target tissues in medical diathermy. Bioelectromagnetics. 31:12-19.
96. Kugel H. Risks and side effects of MRI. In: Rummeny EJ, Reimer P, Heindel W, eds. MR Imaging of the Body. Russian edition. Moscow: Medpress-inform; 2022; pp. 56-61.
97. Cucurachi S, Tamis WL, Vijver MG, Peijnenburg WJ, Bolte JF, de Snoo GR (2013) A review of the ecological effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF). Environ Int. 51:116-140.
98. ICNIRP (2020) Principles for Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Health Phys. 118(5):477-482.
99. Sienkiewicz Z, van Rongen E (2019) Can low-level exposure to radiofrequency fields effect cognitive behaviour in laboratory animals? A systematic review of the literature related to spatial learning and place memory. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 16(9):1607.
100. ICNIRP (2010) Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric and magnetic fields (1 Hz to 100 kHz). Health Phys. 99:818-836.
101. ICNIRP (2020) Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz). Health Phys. 118(5):483-524.
102. Medeiros LN, Sanchez TG (2016) Tinnitus and cell phones: the role of electromagnetic radiofrequency radiation. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 82:97-104.
103. Auvinen A, Feychting M, Ahlbom A, Hillert L, Elliott P, Schüz J et al (2019) Headache, tinnitus and hearing loss in the international Cohort Study of Mobile Phone Use and Health (COSMOS) in Sweden and Finland. Int J Epidemiol. 48:1567-1579.
104. Röösli M, Dongus S, Jalilian H, Eyers J, Esu E, Oringanje CM et al (2024) The effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields exposure on tinnitus, migraine and non-specific symptoms in the general and working population: A systematic review and meta-analysis on human observational studies. Environ Int. 183:108338.
105. Wallace J, Selmaoui B (2019) Effect of mobile phone radiofrequency signal on the alpha rhythm of human waking EEG: a review. Environ Res. 175:274-286.
106. Lowden A, Nagai R, Åkerstedt T, Hansson Mild K, Hillert L (2019) Effects of evening exposure to electromagnetic fields emitted by 3G mobile phones on health and night sleep EEG architecture. J Sleep Res. 28:e12813.
107. Brzozek C, Benke KK, Zeleke BM, Croft RJ, Dalecki A,Dimitriadis C et al (2019) Uncertainty analysis of mobile phone use and its effect on cognitive function: the application of Monte Carlo simulation in a cohort of Australian primary school children. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 16(13):2428.
108. Barth A, Winker R, Ponocny-Seliger E, Mayrhofer W, Ponocny I,Sauter C, Vana N (2008) A meta-analysis for neurobehavioural effects due to electromagnetic field exposure emitted by GSM mobile phones. Occup Environ Med. 65:342-
109. Regel SJ, Achermann P (2011) Cognitive performance measures in bioelectromagnetic research - critical evaluation and recommendations. Environ Health. 10:10.
110. Valentini E, Ferrara M, Presaghi F, De Gennaro L, Curcio G (2010) Systematic review and meta-analysis of psychomotor effects of mobile phone electromagnetic fields. Occup Environ Med. 67:708-716.
111. Benke G, Abramson MJ, Brzozek C, McDonald S, Kelsall H, Sanagou M et al (2024) The effects of radiofrequency exposure on cognition: A systematic review and meta-analysis of human observational studies. Environ Int. 188:108779.
112. Pophof B, Kuhne J, Schmid G, Weiser E, Dorn H, Henschenmacher B et al (2024) The effect of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on cognitive performance in human experimental studies: Systematic review and meta-analyses. Environ Int. 191:108899.
113. Chervyakov AV, Chernyavsky AY, Sinitsyn DO, Piradov MA (2015) Possible mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Front Hum Neurosci. 9:303.
114. McKinley RA, Bridges N, Walters CM, Nelson J (2012) Modulating the brain at work using noninvasive transcranial stimulation. Neuroimage. 59:129-137.
115. Grigoriev YG (2018) Mobile communication and electromagnetic chaos in the assessment of population health hazards. Who isresponsible? Med Radiol Radiation Safety. 58(6):633-645.
116. Grigoriev YG (2018) From electromagnetic smog to electromagnetic chaos. To evaluating the hazards of mobile communication for health of the population. Med Radiol Radiation Safety. 63(3):28-33.
117. Samoilov VO, Vladimirov VG, Sharova LA (2011) Radiobiology of non-ionizing and ionizing radiation. St. Petersburg: Politechnical University. (In Russian)
118. McRee DI (1979) Review of Soviet/Eastern European research on health aspects of microwave radiation. Bull N Y Acad Med. 55:1133-1151.
119. Mitchell CL, McRee DI, Peterson NJ, Tilson HA, Shandala MG, Rudnev MI et al (1989) Results of a United States and Soviet Union joint project on nervous system effects of microwave radiation. Environ Health Perspect. 81:201-209.
120. Repacholi M, Buschmann J, Pioli C, Sypniewska R (2011) International Oversight Committee (IOC) members for the Franco-Russian Project. An international project to confirm Soviet-era results on immunological and teratological effects of RF field exposure in Wistar rats and comments on Grigoriev et al. 2010. Bioelectromagnetics. 32:325-330.
121. Nakage ES, Cardozo JP, Pereira GT, Queiroz SA, Boleli IC (2003) Effect of temperature on incubation period, embryonic mortality, hatch rate, egg water loss and partridge chick weight (Rhynchotus rufescens). Rev Bras Cienc Avic. 5:131-135.
