Эта статья является препринтом и не была отрецензирована.
О результатах, изложенных в препринтах, не следует сообщать в СМИ как о проверенной информации.
From Shadow to Substance: The Sentient Principle as a Unified Framework for Sentience Across All Life
2026-03-17
Current debates surrounding concepts such as “basal cognition,” “minimal cognition,” “plant intelligence,” and “consciousness” are deeply mired in terminological demarcation and phenomenological description, with each side entrenched in its own position and consensus elusive. This paper proposes a meta-theoretical framework based on the “Sentient Principle,” shifting the focus of cognitive research from the “shadow” (definitions, phenomena, analogies) back to the “substance” itself—the living, feeling life itself. We advocate using the “sensation-behavior loop” as the foundational unit for understanding sentience across all life, providing a coherent explanatory framework ranging from the most primitive unicellular organisms to the most complex human mind. By distinguishing between “value-based selection” and “value-dependent selection,” we elucidate the essential differences between “flux” and “consolidation,” introduce “iterative depth” and “memory depth” as core parameters of learning, and employ the concept of “perimpletion” to explain the transgenerational leap in human cognition. This paper emphasizes that all empirical research—whether employing extreme experimental conditions or not—should be openly embraced as long as it can illuminate the biological significance of life (i.e., the first-person subject’s value system sensation). Ultimately, we call for a shift in research from terminological disputes to a profound understanding of the sentient nature of existence.
Ссылка для цитирования:
Wu J. 2026. From Shadow to Substance: The Sentient Principle as a Unified Framework for Sentience Across All Life. PREPRINTS.RU. https://doi.org/10.24108/preprints-3114703
Список литературы
1. [1] Boussard, A., et al. (2019). Memory inception and preservation in slime moulds. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 374, 20180368.
2. [2] Boisseau, R. P., Vogel, D., & Dussutour, A. (2016). Habituation in non-neural organisms: evidence from slime moulds. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 283, 20160446.
3. [3] Vogel, D., & Dussutour, A. (2016). Direct transfer of learned behaviour via cell fusion. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 283, 20162382.
4. [4] Saigusa, T., et al. (2008). Amoebae anticipate periodic events. Physical Review Letters, 100, 018101.
5. [5] Reid, C. R. (2023). Thoughts from the forest floor: a review of cognition in the slime mould Physarum polycephalum. Animal Cognition, 26(6), 1783–1797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-023-01782-1
6. [6] Masui, M., Satoh, S., & Seto, K. (2018). Allorecognition behavior of slime mold plasmodium—Physarum rigidum slime sheath-mediated self-extension model. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 51(28), 284001.
7. [7] Kramar, M., & Alim, K. (2021). Encoding memory in tube diameter hierarchy of living flow network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 118(10), e2007815118.
8. [8] Nejad Kourki, A. (2025). Early transitions in the evolution of cognition. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 47, 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-025-00709-y
9. [9] Taiz, L., et al. (2019). Plants neither possess nor require consciousness. Trends in Plant Science, 24(8), 677–687.
10. [11] Wu, J. (2026). The Sentient Principle. PREPRINTS.RU. https://doi.org/10.24108/preprints-3114502
11. [12] Feigenberg, I. M. (2006). Homo sapiens perimplens and the Biosphere. Voprosy philosophii, (2), 150–161. (In Russian)
