From Creative Origination to Refuge for the Rejected: A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Tenth Section of Jawshan Kabir

SeyyedAbdolHojjat  MoghadasNian,Zahra  Raeisi

ПРЕПРИНТ

Эта статья является препринтом и не была отрецензирована.
О результатах, изложенных в препринтах, не следует сообщать в СМИ как о проверенной информации.

From Creative Origination to Refuge for the Rejected: A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Tenth Section of Jawshan Kabir

S. MoghadasNian,

Z. Raeisi

2026-05-02

https://doi.org/10.24108/preprints-3115134

This article reconstructs the tenth section of Jawshan Kabir (Jawshan al-Kabir) as a bounded, sequence-sensitive sacred semantic architecture within Civilizational Algorithm Theory (CAT). Rather than reading the passage as a flat list of devotional epithets, it argues that the section encodes an ordered progression from making, creation, provision, and lordship to distress relief, grief release, restorative mercy, support for the forsaken, dignity-preserving concealment, and finally refuge for the rejected. Methodologically, the study adopts a qualitative, conceptual, design-science approach based on bounded corpus delimitation, rule-based textual segmentation, morphology-sensitive reading, semantic clustering, controlled Qur’anic-hadith intertextuality, and bounded translation into theological, systemic, governance, and resilience layers. The findings show that the section is internally structured as a directed semantic sequence rather than a cumulative liturgical list. Its decisive formal marker is the shift from a dominant chain of active participial forms to the noun maljaʾ in the final unit, signaling a terminal refuge node. The article contributes a reproducible pathway from sacred semantics to auditable conceptual design and shows that the section yields a compressed ontology of creation, provision, mercy, dignity protection, and reinclusive refuge.

Ссылка для цитирования:

MoghadasNian S., Raeisi Z. 2026. From Creative Origination to Refuge for the Rejected: A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Tenth Section of Jawshan Kabir. PREPRINTS.RU. https://doi.org/10.24108/preprints-3115134

Список литературы

1. Aydınlı, A. (2011). The prayer of jawshan: A study of its sources. Ilahiyat Studies, 2(1), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.12730/13091719.2011.21.27

2. Chandler, D. (2014). Resilience: The governance of complexity. Routledge.

3. Gregor, S., & Hevner, A. R. (2013). Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.01

4. Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625

5. MoghadasNian, S. (2025a). Ecumenical Christian KPI Framework (ECKF): A KPI-Based Strategic Architecture for Christian Unity and Institutional Dialogue. University of Religions and Denominations. https://doi.org/ 10.13140/RG.2.2.31969.21609

6. MoghadasNian, S. (2025b). Global Kalam Strategic Framework (GKSF): A fourteen-pillar KPI-based comparative model for Islamic unity and theological convergence. University of Religions and Denominations. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16774.28489/1

7. MoghadasNian, S. (2025c). Interfaith Doctrinal Dialogue Framework (IDDF): A KPI-Oriented Architecture for Abrahamic Unity. University of Religions and Denominations. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.13026.85443

8. MoghadasNian, S. (2025d). Islamic Ḥiwār Framework (IHF): A KPI-Based Architecture for Intra-Faith Dialogue and Civilizational Unity. University of Religions and Denominations. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.34234.30403

9. MoghadasNian, S. (2025e). Taqrib Diagnostic–Decision Model (TDDM): A multi-dimensional framework for classifying, designing, and evaluating Islamic intra-faith rapprochement. University of Religions and Denominations. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27306.68806

10. MoghadasNian, S. (2025f). Twelve-pillar framework for comparative jurisprudence (TPF-CJ). University of Religions and Denominations. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.26840.61441/1

11. MoghadasNian, S. (2025g). UCTA‑PA: Unified Civilizational Theological Architecture: A Performance Architecture for Measurable Rapprochement and Civilizational Renewal. University of Religions and Denominations. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16602.40647

12. MoghadasNian, S. (2026). Civilizational Algorithm Theory (CAT): A Design–Science Method for Sacred-Text Ontology Structuring and Theology-to-Governance Translation. University of Religions and Denominations. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17244.86400

13. MoghadasNian, S., & Haghighi, N. (2026). Transcendent Governance, Provisioning, and Canonical Closure: A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Fourth Section of Jawshan Kabir. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19105298

14. MoghadasNian, S., & Hoseini Taheri, J.M. (2026). Reconstructing Sacred Semantics: A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Third Section of Jawshan Kabir. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19105110

15. MoghadasNian, S., & Karami, F. (2026). From Protective Restraint to Expansive Plenitude: A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Ninth Section of Jawshan Kabir. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19428627

16. MoghadasNian, S., & MoghadasNian, A. (2026a). Compassionate Regulation, Evidentiary Authority, and Clarifying Grace: A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Fifth Section of Jawshan Kabir. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19122769

17. MoghadasNian, S., & MoghadasNian, N. (2026d). From Doxological Legitimacy to Bountiful Sovereignty: A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Eighth Section of Jawshan Kabir. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19415783

18. MoghadasNian, S., & MoghadasNian, S. A. H. (2024). Optimizing Islamic unity and approximation initiatives: A KPI-driven analytical approach. In Proceedings of the 10th National Interdisciplinary Research Conference in Huminitic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18149473

19. MoghadasNian, S., & MoghadasNian, S.A.H. (2026b). Governance-in-Action in Sacred Semantics: A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Second Section of Jawshan Kabir. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19104928

20. MoghadasNian, S., & MoghadasNian, Z. (2026c). From Majesty to Justice-Constrained Sovereignty A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Sixth Section of Jawshan Kabir. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19377115

21. MoghadasNian, S., & Rabiee, M. (2026). Forgiveness, Affliction Relief, and Restored Agency A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Seventh Section of Jawshan Kabir. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19377354

22. MoghadasNian, S., JafarTayari Dehaqani, M., & MoghadasNian, S.M.H. (2026). Sacred texts as civilizational algorithms: A cybernetic–theological analysis of the opening invocation of Jawshan Kabir. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19104667

23. MoghadasNian, S., Karami, F., & MoghadasNian, A. S. (2024). Applying key performance indicators (KPIs) in Quranic sciences: An interdisciplinary approach to enhance understanding and interpretation. In Proceedings of the 19th National Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18618592

24. Naudé, J. A., & Miller-Naudé, C. L. (2022). Meaning-making processes in religious translation involving sacred space. In K. Marais (Ed.), Translation beyond translation studies (pp. 197–218). Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350192140.ch-10

25. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–77. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302

26. Qummī, ʿAbbās ibn Muḥammad Riḍā. (1376 [1997/1998]). Kullīyāt-i Mafātīḥ al-jinān. Nashr-i Muḥammad.

27. Richards, P. D. G. (2024). Church Governance—A Philosophical Approach to a Theological Challenge in an Anglican Context. Religions, 15(4), 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15040427

28. Shomali, M. A. (2012). Reflections on the supplication (Duʿa) of Jawshan al-Kabir. Spiritual Quest, 2(2), 49–61.

29. Sosis, R., & Kiper, J. (2014). Why religion is better conceived as a complex system than a norm-enforcing institution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(3), 275–276. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13003038

30. The Qur’an (M. A. S. Abdel Haleem, Trans.). (2004). Oxford University Press.

31. Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., & Baskerville, R. (2016). FEDS: A framework for evaluation in design science research. European Journal of Information Systems, 25(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.36

ПРЕПРИНТ

ИНФОРМАЦИЯ

Использование куки-файлов