Эта статья является препринтом и не была отрецензирована.
О результатах, изложенных в препринтах, не следует сообщать в СМИ как о проверенной информации.
From Doxological Legitimacy to Bountiful Sovereignty: A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Eighth Section of Jawshan Kabir
This article reconstructs the eighth section of Jawshan Kabir as a bounded sacred semantic architecture within the framework of Civilizational Algorithm Theory (CAT). Rather than reading the section as a cumulative devotional list of divine epithets, the study argues that it encodes an ordered movement from doxological legitimacy to glory, covenantal fidelity, restorative mercy, benefactive bestowal, judicial closure, enduring sovereignty, generosity, and finally bounty and blessing. Methodologically, the article adopts a qualitative, conceptual, and design-science-oriented approach grounded in bounded corpus delimitation, textual segmentation, morphology-sensitive reading, semantic clustering, Qur’anic intertextual control, theological synthesis, and downstream systems, governance, and civilizational translation. The findings demonstrate that the section is internally organized as a directed semantic network rather than a flat chain of co-rhyming names. Praise and laudation serve as the entry node of legitimacy, covenant functions as the relational pivot, judgment as the decisional core, enduring might as the resilience anchor, and bounty and blessing as the terminal horizon of distributed beneficence. The article contributes theoretically by extending the CAT/Jawshan corpus into a more explicit architecture of legitimacy, trust, repair, closure, durable order, and flourishing. Methodologically, it demonstrates how a compact liturgical passage may be translated into an auditable theology-to-governance pathway without collapsing theological discourse into managerial instrumentalism. Practically, it offers a principle-bound vocabulary for dialogue architecture, restorative governance, resilience design, institutional legitimacy, and civilizational evaluation.
1. al-Kafʿamī, Ibrāhīm ibn ʿAlī. (1997). al-Balad al-amīn wa-al-dirʿ al-ḥaṣīn. Muʾassasat al-Aʿlamī lil-Maṭbūʿāt.
2. Aydınlı, A. (2011). The prayer of jawshan: A study of its sources. Ilahiyat Studies, 2(1), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.12730/13091719.2011.21.27
3. Chandler, D. (2014). Resilience: The governance of complexity. Routledge.
4. Gregor, S., & Hevner, A. R. (2013). Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.01
5. Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625
6. Hutchinson, B. (2024). Modeling the sacred: Considerations when using religious texts in natural language processing. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2024 (pp. 1029–1043). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.findings-naacl.65
7. Izutsu, T. (2002). God and man in the Qur'an: Semantics of the Qur'anic Weltanschauung (New ed.). Islamic Book Trust. (Original work published 1964)
8. MoghadasNian, S. (2026). Civilizational Algorithm Theory (CAT): A Design–Science Method for Sacred-Text Ontology Structuring and Theology-to-Governance Translation. University of Religions and Denominations. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17244.86400
9. MoghadasNian, S., & Haghighi, N. (2026). Transcendent Governance, Provisioning, and Canonical Closure: A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Fourth Section of Jawshan Kabir. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19105298
10. MoghadasNian, S., & Hoseini Taheri, J.M. (2026). Reconstructing Sacred Semantics: A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Third Section of Jawshan Kabir. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19105110
11. MoghadasNian, S., & MoghadasNian, A. (2026a). Compassionate Regulation, Evidentiary Authority, and Clarifying Grace: A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Fifth Section of Jawshan Kabir. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19122769
12. MoghadasNian, S., & MoghadasNian, S.A.H. (2026b). Governance-in-Action in Sacred Semantics: A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Second Section of Jawshan Kabir. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19104928
13. MoghadasNian, S., & MoghadasNian, Z. (2026c). From Majesty to Justice-Constrained Sovereignty A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Sixth Section of Jawshan Kabir. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19377115
14. MoghadasNian, S., & Rabiee, M. (2026). Forgiveness, Affliction Relief, and Restored Agency A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Seventh Section of Jawshan Kabir. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19377354
15. MoghadasNian, S., JafarTayari Dehaqani, M., & MoghadasNian, S.M.H. (2026). Sacred texts as civilizational algorithms: A cybernetic–theological analysis of the opening invocation of Jawshan Kabir. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19104667
16. Naudé, J. A., & Miller-Naudé, C. L. (2022). Meaning-making processes in religious translation involving sacred space. In K. Marais (Ed.), Translation beyond translation studies (pp. 197–218). Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350192140.ch-10
17. Qummī, ʿAbbās ibn Muḥammad Riḍā. (1376 [1997/1998]). Kullīyāt-i Mafātīḥ al-jinān. Nashr-i Muḥammad.
18. Richards, P. D. G. (2024). Church Governance—A Philosophical Approach to a Theological Challenge in an Anglican Context. Religions, 15(4), 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15040427
19. Sosis, R., & Kiper, J. (2014). Why religion is better conceived as a complex system than a norm-enforcing institution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(3), 275–276. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13003038
20. Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., & Baskerville, R. (2016). FEDS: A framework for evaluation in design science research. European Journal of Information Systems, 25(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.36
