From Majesty to Justice-Constrained Sovereignty: A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Sixth Section of Jawshan Kabir

SeyyedAbdolHojjat  MoghadasNian,ZahraSadat  MoghadasNian

ПРЕПРИНТ

Эта статья является препринтом и не была отрецензирована.
О результатах, изложенных в препринтах, не следует сообщать в СМИ как о проверенной информации.

From Majesty to Justice-Constrained Sovereignty: A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Sixth Section of Jawshan Kabir

S. MoghadasNian,

Z. MoghadasNian

2026-05-09

https://doi.org/10.24108/preprints-3115186

This article presents a Civilizational Algorithm Theory (CAT) analysis of the sixth section of Jawshan Kabir, beginning with “Yā man tawāḍaʿa kullu shayʾin li-ʿaẓamatihi” and culminating in “yā man lā yaʿtadī ʿalā ahli mamlakatihi.” Its primary objective is to demonstrate that this section is not a loose devotional sequence, but a tightly ordered narrative civilizational micro-architecture. More specifically, the study reconstructs how the section moves from ontological decentering before divine greatness to compliance, anti-hubris discipline, reverential restraint, rupture-awareness, macro-order, substrate stability, symbolic signification, and finally justice-constrained sovereignty. Methodologically, the article adopts a qualitative, conceptual, and design-science approach using CAT as a framework for sacred-text ontology structuring and theology-to-governance translation. The analysis relies on bounded corpus delimitation, lexical-morphological coding, semantic clustering, Qurʾanic intertextual mapping, hermeneutical synthesis, and systems-philosophical, cybernetic, and governance translation. The findings show that Section Six yields a coherent theology-to-governance pathway in which transcendence is translated into ethics, ethics into behavioral regulation, regulation into institutional order, and institutional order into resilience, symbolic coherence, and justice-bounded legitimacy. The study contributes to CAT scholarship, Jawshan Kabir studies, and design-science approaches in religion and governance by showing that a liturgical text can function as a structured source of civilizational design, taqrīb logic, crisis prevention, and justice-centered governance architecture.

Ссылка для цитирования:

MoghadasNian S., MoghadasNian Z. 2026. From Majesty to Justice-Constrained Sovereignty: A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Sixth Section of Jawshan Kabir. PREPRINTS.RU. https://doi.org/10.24108/preprints-3115186

Список литературы

1. al-Kafʿamī, Ibrāhīm ibn ʿAlī. (1997). al-Balad al-amīn wa-al-dirʿ al-ḥaṣīn. Muʾassasat al-Aʿlamī lil-Maṭbūʿāt.

2. Aydınlı, A. (2011). The prayer of jawshan: A study of its sources. Ilahiyat Studies, 2(1), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.12730/13091719.2011.21.27

3. Chandler, D. (2014). Resilience: The governance of complexity. Routledge.

4. Checkland, P. (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice. John Wiley & Sons.

5. Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and method (2nd rev. ed., J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). Continuum.

6. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. Basic Books.

7. Gregor, S., & Hevner, A. R. (2013). Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.01

8. Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625

9. Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245

10. Hutchinson, B. (2024). Modeling the sacred: Considerations when using religious texts in natural language processing. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2024 (pp. 1029–1043). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.findings-naacl.65

11. Izutsu, T. (2002). God and man in the Qur'an: Semantics of the Qur'anic Weltanschauung (New ed.). Islamic Book Trust. (Original work published 1964)

12. Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. Chelsea Green Publishing.

13. MoghadasNian, S. (2025a). Ecumenical Christian KPI Framework (ECKF): A KPI-Based Strategic Architecture for Christian Unity and Institutional Dialogue. University of Religions and Denominations. https://doi.org/ 10.13140/RG.2.2.31969.21609

14. MoghadasNian, S. (2025b). Global Kalam Strategic Framework (GKSF): A fourteen-pillar KPI-based comparative model for Islamic unity and theological convergence. University of Religions and Denominations. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16774.28489/1

15. MoghadasNian, S. (2025c). Interfaith Doctrinal Dialogue Framework (IDDF): A KPI-Oriented Architecture for Abrahamic Unity. University of Religions and Denominations. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.13026.85443

16. MoghadasNian, S. (2025d). Islamic Ḥiwār Framework (IHF): A KPI-Based Architecture for Intra-Faith Dialogue and Civilizational Unity. University of Religions and Denominations. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.34234.30403

17. MoghadasNian, S. (2025e). Taqrīb Quadripartite Architecture (TQA-4): A KPI-Governed Super-Framework for Engineering Islamic Unity. University of Religions and Denominations. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10560.80646

18. MoghadasNian, S. (2025f). Taqrib Diagnostic–Decision Model (TDDM): A multi-dimensional framework for classifying, designing, and evaluating Islamic intra-faith rapprochement. University of Religions and Denominations. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27306.68806

19. MoghadasNian, S. (2025g). UCTA‑PA: Unified Civilizational Theological Architecture: A Performance Architecture for Measurable Rapprochement and Civilizational Renewal. University of Religions and Denominations. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16602.40647

20. MoghadasNian, S. (2026). Civilizational Algorithm Theory (CAT): A Design–Science Method for Sacred-Text Ontology Structuring and Theology-to-Governance Translation. University of Religions and Denominations. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17244.86400

21. MoghadasNian, S., & Haghighi, N. (2026). Transcendent Governance, Provisioning, and Canonical Closure: A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Fourth Section of Jawshan Kabir. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19105298

22. MoghadasNian, S., & Hoseini Taheri, J.M. (2026). Reconstructing Sacred Semantics: A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Third Section of Jawshan Kabir. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19105110

23. MoghadasNian, S., & MoghadasNian, A. (2026a). Compassionate Regulation, Evidentiary Authority, and Clarifying Grace: A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Fifth Section of Jawshan Kabir. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19122769

24. MoghadasNian, S., & MoghadasNian, S.A.H. (2026b). Governance-in-Action in Sacred Semantics: A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Second Section of Jawshan Kabir. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19104928

25. MoghadasNian, S., JafarTayari Dehaqani, M., & MoghadasNian, S.M.H. (2026). Sacred texts as civilizational algorithms: A cybernetic–theological analysis of the opening invocation of Jawshan Kabir. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19104667

26. Naudé, J. A., & Miller-Naudé, C. L. (2022). Meaning-making processes in religious translation involving sacred space. In K. Marais (Ed.), Translation beyond translation studies (pp. 197–218). Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350192140.ch-10

27. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–77. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302

28. Qummī, ʿAbbās ibn Muḥammad Riḍā. (1376 [1997/1998]). Kullīyāt-i Mafātīḥ al-jinān. Nashr-i Muḥammad.

29. Richards, P. D. G. (2024). Church Governance—A Philosophical Approach to a Theological Challenge in an Anglican Context. Religions, 15(4), 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15040427

30. Ricoeur, P. (1976). Interpretation theory: Discourse and the surplus of meaning. Texas Christian University Press.

31. Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). MIT Press.

32. Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., & Baskerville, R. (2016). FEDS: A framework for evaluation in design science research. European Journal of Information Systems, 25(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.36

33. von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. George Braziller.

ПРЕПРИНТ

ИНФОРМАЦИЯ

Использование куки-файлов