Эта статья является препринтом и не была отрецензирована.
О результатах, изложенных в препринтах, не следует сообщать в СМИ как о проверенной информации.
Compassionate Regulation, Evidentiary Authority, and Clarifying Grace: A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Fifth Section of Jawshan Kabir
This article reconstructs the fifth section of Jawshan Kabir as an integrated governance architecture within the framework of Civilizational Algorithm Theory (CAT). Rather than treating the sequence of ten divine names as a cumulative devotional list, the study argues that the section encodes an ordered logic of compassionate initiation, benevolent provision, normative accountability, evidentiary legitimation, legitimate execution, ultimate approval, restorative forgiveness, transcendence safeguarding, adaptive assistance, and the final integration of grace with clarifying expression. Methodologically, the study adopts a qualitative, conceptual, and design-science-oriented approach grounded in bounded-text analysis, semantic extraction, theological interpretation, systems translation, cybernetic mapping, governance translation, and indicative KPI derivation. The findings show that the section is internally organized as a coherent civilizational control stack rather than a merely liturgical accumulation of co-rhyming names. Theoretically, the article extends CAT beyond ontological grounding, governance-in-action, executional optimality, and transcendent governance toward a more explicit architecture of compassionate regulation and communicative intelligibility. Methodologically, it demonstrates how a bounded sacred sequence may be translated into layered system roles and governance-relevant constructs without collapsing theology into managerial instrumentalism. Practically, it offers a principle-bound framework for institutions concerned with trust formation, fair adjudication, legitimate authority, restorative recovery, conceptual integrity, operational support, and clear public communication. The article concludes that the fifth section of Jawshan Kabir can be read as a sacred governance module for legitimate, restorative, and intelligible civilizational order.
1. Al-Ghazali, A. H. (1992). Al-Ghazali on the ninety-nine beautiful names of God (D. B. Burrell & N. Daher, Trans.). Islamic Texts Society.
2. Chandler, D. (2014). Resilience: The governance of complexity. Routledge.
3. Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625
4. Hutchinson, B. (2024). Modeling the sacred: Considerations when using religious texts in natural language processing. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2024 (pp. 1029–1043). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.findings-naacl.65
5. Izutsu, T. (2002). God and man in the Qur'an: Semantics of the Qur'anic Weltanschauung (New ed.). Islamic Book Trust. (Original work published 1964)
6. Krieger, M. H. (1987). Planning and Design as Theological and Religious Activities. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 14(1), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1068/b140005
7. MoghadasNian, S. (2026). Civilizational Algorithm Theory (CAT): A Design–Science Method for Sacred-Text Ontology Structuring and Theology-to-Governance Translation. University of Religions and Denominations. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17244.86400
8. MoghadasNian, S., & Haghighi, N. (2026). Transcendent Governance, Provisioning, and Canonical Closure: A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Fourth Section of Jawshan Kabir. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19105298
9. MoghadasNian, S., & Hoseini Taheri, J.M. (2026). Reconstructing Sacred Semantics: A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Second Section of Jawshan Kabir. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19105110
10. MoghadasNian, S., & MoghadasNian, S.A.H. (2026). Governance-in-Action in Sacred Semantics: A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Second Section of Jawshan Kabir. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19104928
11. MoghadasNian, S., JafarTayari Dehaqani, M., & MoghadasNian, S.M.H. (2026). Sacred texts as civilizational algorithms: A cybernetic–theological analysis of the opening invocation of Jawshan Kabir. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19104667
12. Nanthambwe, P. (2025). Integrating African Indigenous Knowledge Systems (AIKSs) into Public Theology: Towards Contextualized Theological Engagement in Southern Africa. Religions, 16(7), 869. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16070869
13. Naudé, J.A. , & Miller-Naudé, C.L. (2022). Meaning-making Processes in Religious Translation Involving Sacred Space. In K. Marais (Ed.). TRANSLATION BEYOND TRANSLATION STUDIES (pp. 197–218). London,: Bloomsbury Academic. Retrieved March 16, 2026, from http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350192140.ch-10
14. OECD. (2025). Government at a glance 2025. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/0efd0bcd-en
15. Oyo, C., Musinguzi, D., & Owino, P. (2025). Contract-covenant governance model: A theoretical framework for integrated faith-based institutional governance in Catholic organizations. East African Scholars Multidisciplinary Bulletin, 8(4), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.36349/easjmb.2025.v08i04.002
16. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–77. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302
17. Qummī, ʿAbbās ibn Muḥammad Riḍā. (1376 [1997/1998]). Kullīyāt-i Mafātīḥ al-jinān. Nashr-i Muḥammad.
18. Richards, P. D. G. (2024). Church Governance—A Philosophical Approach to a Theological Challenge in an Anglican Context. Religions, 15(4), 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15040427
19. Sosis, R., & Kiper, J. (2014). Why religion is better conceived as a complex system than a norm-enforcing institution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(3), 275–276. doi:10.1017/S0140525X13003038
20. Zehr, H. (2002). The little book of restorative justice. Good Books.
