Эта статья является препринтом и не была отрецензирована.
О результатах, изложенных в препринтах, не следует сообщать в СМИ как о проверенной информации.
Transcendent Governance, Provisioning, and Canonical Closure: A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Fourth Section of Jawshan Kabir
2026-05-10
This article reconstructs the fourth section of Jawshan Kabir as a coherent governance-and-control architecture within the framework of Civilizational Algorithm Theory (CAT). Rather than treating the sequence of ten divine attributes as a cumulative devotional list, the study argues that the stanza encodes an ordered logic of legitimacy, capability, sovereignty, transcendence, provisioning, deterrence, audit, enforcement, reward, and canonical anchoring. Methodologically, the article adopts a qualitative, conceptual, and design-science-oriented approach based on bounded-text analysis, semantic decomposition, conceptual mapping, systems modelling, cybernetic translation, and governance indicator design. The findings show that the section is internally organized through four interlocking movements: exclusive possession of foundational excellences, identity-based transcendence, world-engaging action and control, and final return to reward and the mother-source of inscription. On this basis, the article proposes that the fourth section functions as a governance-resilience-canon stack. Theoretically, the study extends CAT beyond ontological grounding, governance-in-action, and executional optimality toward a more explicit architecture of transcendent governance. Methodologically, it demonstrates how a sacred text can be translated into layered system roles, cybernetic functions, and conceptually grounded KPI-style constructs without collapsing theology into managerial instrumentalism. Practically, it offers a principle-bound governance template in which dignity, capability, authority, provisioning, accountability, reward, and canonical memory remain structurally integrated.
Ссылка для цитирования:
MoghadasNian S., Haghighi N. 2026. Transcendent Governance, Provisioning, and Canonical Closure: A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Fourth Section of Jawshan Kabir. PREPRINTS.RU. https://doi.org/10.24108/preprints-3115199
Список литературы
1. Aydınlı, A. (2011). The prayer of jawshan: A study of its sources. Ilahiyat Studies, 2(1), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.12730/13091719.2011.21.27
2. Chandler, D. (2014). Resilience: The governance of complexity. Routledge.
3. Fisher, M. Z. (2024). Entropy and the Idea of God(s): A Philosophical Approach to Religion as a Complex Adaptive System. Religions, 15(8), 925. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15080925
4. Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625
5. Hutchinson, B. (2024). Modeling the sacred: Considerations when using religious texts in natural language processing. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2024 (pp. 1029–1043). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.findings-naacl.65
6. MoghadasNian, S. (2026). Civilizational Algorithm Theory (CAT): A Design–Science Method for Sacred-Text Ontology Structuring and Theology-to-Governance Translation. University of Religions and Denominations. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17244.86400
7. MoghadasNian, S., & Hoseini Taheri, J.M. (2026). Reconstructing Sacred Semantics: A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Third Section of Jawshan Kabir. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19105110
8. MoghadasNian, S., & MoghadasNian, S.A.H. (2026). Governance-in-Action in Sacred Semantics: A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Second Section of Jawshan Kabir. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19104928
9. MoghadasNian, S., JafarTayari Dehaqani, M., & MoghadasNian, S.M.H. (2026). Sacred texts as civilizational algorithms: A cybernetic–theological analysis of the opening invocation of Jawshan Kabir. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19104667
10. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–77. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302
11. Qummī, ʿAbbās ibn Muḥammad Riḍā. (1376 [1997/1998]). Kullīyāt-i Mafātīḥ al-jinān. Nashr-i Muḥammad.
12. Richards, P. D. G. (2024). Church Governance—A Philosophical Approach to a Theological Challenge in an Anglican Context. Religions, 15(4), 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15040427
13. Sosis, R., & Kiper, J. (2014). Why religion is better conceived as a complex system than a norm-enforcing institution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(3), 275–276. doi:10.1017/S0140525X13003038
