Эта статья является препринтом и не была отрецензирована.
О результатах, изложенных в препринтах, не следует сообщать в СМИ как о проверенной информации.
Reconstructing Sacred Semantics: A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Third Section of Jawshan Kabir
This article develops a theory-building and governance-oriented reading of the third section of Jawshan Kabir through the lens of Civilizational Algorithm Theory (CAT). It examines whether the sequence of ten divine epithets, from Khayr al-Ghāfirīn to Khayr al-Muḥsinīn, can be reconstructed as a coherent civilizational execution stack rather than a cumulative liturgical list. Methodologically, the study adopts a qualitative, design-science-oriented conceptual approach based on bounded-text analysis, semantic extraction, theological interpretation, systems translation, and indicative KPI derivation. The analysis shows that the section encodes an ordered logic of restorative correction, opening, support mobilization, normative adjudication, provisioning sufficiency, continuity preservation, recognition, remembrance, ordered deployment, and ihsanic value addition. The findings suggest that the third section functions as a compressed grammar of civilizational execution and extends CAT beyond ontological grounding and governance-in-action toward executional optimality. The article contributes theoretically by advancing sacred-semantics-to-governance translation, methodologically by offering a replicable model for bounded-corpus reconstruction, and practically by proposing an evaluative vocabulary for institutions concerned with restorative justice, institutional de-bottlenecking, continuity management, and excellence-oriented public action.
1. Chandler, D. (2014). Beyond neoliberalism: resilience, the new art of governing complexity. Resilience, 2(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2013.878544
2. Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105.
3. Krieger, M. H. (1987). Planning and Design as Theological and Religious Activities. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 14(1), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1068/b140005
4. MoghadasNian, S. (2026). Civilizational Algorithm Theory (CAT): A Design–Science Method for Sacred-Text Ontology Structuring and Theology-to-Governance Translation. University of Religions and Denominations. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17244.86400
5. MoghadasNian, S., & MoghadasNian, S. A. H. (2024). Optimizing Islamic unity and approximation initiatives: A KPI-driven analytical approach. In Proceedings of the 10th National Interdisciplinary Research Conference in Huminitic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18149473
6. MoghadasNian, S., & MoghadasNian, S.A.H. (2026). Governance-in-Action in Sacred Semantics: A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Second Section of Jawshan Kabir. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19104928
7. MoghadasNian, S., JafarTayari Dehaqani, M., & MoghadasNian, S.M.H. (2026). Sacred texts as civilizational algorithms: A cybernetic–theological analysis of the opening invocation of Jawshan Kabir. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19104667
8. MoghadasNian, S., Karami, F., & MoghadasNian, A. S. (2024). Applying key performance indicators (KPIs) in Quranic sciences: An interdisciplinary approach to enhance understanding and interpretation. In Proceedings of the 19th National Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18618592
9. Nanthambwe, P. (2025). Integrating African Indigenous Knowledge Systems (AIKSs) into Public Theology: Towards Contextualized Theological Engagement in Southern Africa. Religions, 16(7), 869. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16070869
10. Naudé, J.A. , & Miller-Naudé, C.L. (2022). Meaning-making Processes in Religious Translation Involving Sacred Space. In K. Marais (Ed.). TRANSLATION BEYOND TRANSLATION STUDIES (pp. 197–218). London,: Bloomsbury Academic. Retrieved March 16, 2026, from http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350192140.ch-10
11. OECD. (2025). Government at a glance 2025. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/0efd0bcd-en
12. Oyo, C., Musinguzi, D., & Owino, P. (2025). Contract-covenant governance model: A theoretical framework for integrated faith-based institutional governance in Catholic organizations. East African Scholars Multidisciplinary Bulletin, 8(4), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.36349/easjmb.2025.v08i04.002
13. Qummī, ʿAbbās ibn Muḥammad Riḍā. (1376 [1997/1998]). Kullīyāt-i Mafātīḥ al-jinān. Nashr-i Muḥammad.
14. Richards, P. D. G. (2024). Church Governance—A Philosophical Approach to a Theological Challenge in an Anglican Context. Religions, 15(4), 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15040427
