Эта статья является препринтом и не была отрецензирована.
О результатах, изложенных в препринтах, не следует сообщать в СМИ как о проверенной информации.
Governance-in-Action in Sacred Semantics: A Civilizational Algorithm Theory Analysis of the Second Section of Jawshan Kabir
This article presents a conceptual and systems-oriented interpretation of the second section of Jawshan Kabir through the lens of Civilizational Algorithm Theory (CAT). It explores how this bounded sacred text may be read, in addition to its devotional significance, as a coherent governance sequence comprising authority, responsiveness, elevation, ethical stewardship, restorative correction, provision, reintegration, listening, hidden-state awareness, and crisis deflection. The study employs a qualitative conceptual design grounded in bounded-text analysis and theological-hermeneutic interpretation. Its ten divine attributes are examined through semantic analysis, theological hermeneutics, cybernetic mapping, governance translation, and the construction of indicative evaluative variables. The analysis indicates that the section forms an ordered governance-in-action grammar rather than merely a liturgical list of divine names. The article therefore extends CAT from ontological grounding to operational governance interpretation and identifies a distinct governance layer embedded in sacred semantics. Its contributions are threefold: it deepens theology-to-governance translation, demonstrates the analytical adaptability of CAT across compact textual units, and proposes a normative framework for responsive, restorative, attentive, and resilient institutions. The article concludes by calling for expert review, refinement of the proposed variables, and comparative application across other sacred corpora and governance settings.
1. Ahsani, M., Ismail, S., Fallah, S., Ismail, N., & al-Ameen, A. (2024). The Relationship Between Islamic Principles and Architectural Sacredness in Islam. Journal of Islamic Architecture, 8(2), 530-544. doi:https://doi.org/10.18860/jia.v8i2.23918
2. Chandler, D. (2014). Beyond neoliberalism: resilience, the new art of governing complexity. Resilience, 2(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2013.878544
3. Ghafran, C., & Yasmin, S. (2020). Ethical Governance: Insight from the Islamic Perspective and an Empirical Enquiry. Journal of Business Ethics, 167, 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10551-019-04170-3
4. Haniffah, N. L., Shaiban, M. S., & Ahmed, P. (2023). Development and validation of a performance measurement system based on Islamic principles. Heliyon, 9(5), e16095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16095
5. Krieger, M. H. (1987). Planning and Design as Theological and Religious Activities. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 14(1), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1068/b140005
6. Kumar, A., & Sangwan, S. R. (2025). Natural language processing as Digital Veda (डिजिटल वेद): A humanistic framework for language, ethics, and AI. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 40(4), 1188–1202. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqaf100
7. MoghadasNian, S. (2025a). Taqrib Diagnostic–Decision Model (TDDM): A multi-dimensional framework for classifying, designing, and evaluating Islamic intra-faith rapprochement. University of Religions and Denominations. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27306.68806
8. MoghadasNian, S. (2025b). UCTA‑PA: Unified Civilizational Theological Architecture: A Performance Architecture for Measurable Rapprochement and Civilizational Renewal. University of Religions and Denominations. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16602.40647
9. MoghadasNian, S. (2025c). Taqrīb Quadripartite Architecture (TQA-4): A KPI-Governed Super-Framework for Engineering Islamic Unity. University of Religions and Denominations. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10560.80646
10. MoghadasNian, S. (2025d). 7S-360 Strategic Indicator Architecture: A KPI-Governed Framework for Integrated Governance. University of Religions and Denominations (URD). DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15665.24160
11. MoghadasNian, S. (2026). Civilizational Algorithm Theory (CAT): A Design–Science Method for Sacred-Text Ontology Structuring and Theology-to-Governance Translation. University of Religions and Denominations. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17244.86400
12. MoghadasNian, S., JafarTayari Dehaqani, M., & MoghadasNian, S.M.H. (2026). Sacred texts as civilizational algorithms: A cybernetic–theological analysis of the opening invocation of Jawshan Kabir. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19104667
13. Naudé, J.A. , & Miller-Naudé, C.L. (2022). Meaning-making Processes in Religious Translation Involving Sacred Space. In K. Marais (Ed.). TRANSLATION BEYOND TRANSLATION STUDIES (pp. 197–218). London,: Bloomsbury Academic. Retrieved March 16, 2026, from http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350192140.ch-10
14. Qummī, ʿAbbās ibn Muḥammad Riḍā. (1376 [1997/1998]). Kullīyāt-i Mafātīḥ al-jinān. Nashr-i Muḥammad.
15. Richards, P. D. G. (2024). Church Governance—A Philosophical Approach to a Theological Challenge in an Anglican Context. Religions, 15(4), 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15040427
