This article is devoted to the problems of the origin of the cypro-Minoan script (1500 B.C). The author proposes to revise some of the ideas about its origin that have been established since the last century. In particular, the statements concerning the Cretan script as the basis of the Cypriot letter will be questioned. The author does not believe that the Cretan hieroglyphic seals contain text, but believes that the images are separate pictograms, the meaning of which is linked to a separate seal. And “linear letter A” can't come from them. There is no connection between the characters of “linear A” and the characters of the Cypriot script that are completely different in their style. The author suggests that the latter arose independently on the basis of Neolithic pictographs, and was influenced by the hieroglyphs of Egypt and luvian writing. Therefore, we believe that the Cyprus letter is not legally called Minoan. A careful study of the Enkomi Tablet, Fragment 3 (Table 2), has led us to the following conclusion. It is not related to other Fragments found in the same place (Table 3), and differs significantly from them. We have identified four separate zones for filling in Fragment 3 (Table 9). When you increase the surface of the latter, you can clearly see the drawing images that we call "second-level signs". Additional images are mostly present on Fragment 3, which makes this artifact a unique piece.