Эта статья является препринтом и не была отрецензирована.
О результатах, изложенных в препринтах, не следует сообщать в СМИ как о проверенной информации.
Auditable AI Decision Intelligence for Aviation MRO A KPI Governance Architecture
Aviation Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul (MRO) organizations increasingly possess enterprise resource planning data, inventory records, work-order histories, procurement evidence, quality documentation, finance approvals, and customer commitments, yet many operational decisions remain delayed, fragmented, and weakly auditable. This article develops the Aviation Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul Decision Intelligence Governance Framework (AMRO-DIGF), a design-science architecture for governing artificial intelligence-enabled decision intelligence in safety-critical aviation maintenance environments. The study synthesizes aviation digital-operations guidance, airworthiness and repair-station obligations, AI risk-management standards, design-science theory, aircraft-maintenance AI literature, and a prior author-developed corpus on KPI-governed airline logistics, AISA-L, MRO efficiency, AI performance measurement, stock control, and predictive maintenance. AMRO-DIGF consists of five interdependent layers: data integration and lineage, operational diagnostics, AI-assisted recommendation, human authority and compliance governance, and KPI-based feedback. The contribution is not another dashboard or predictive-maintenance tool; it is a governance architecture that converts fragmented MRO evidence into traceable, human-authorized, compliance-aware, financially disciplined decisions. The article argues that AI creates credible MRO value only when recommendations are connected to evidence quality, bottleneck diagnosis, decision rights, airworthiness boundaries, override records, cybersecurity, and post-decision learning. The paper offers formula-level KPI logic for turnaround risk, bottleneck severity, parts readiness, margin leakage, AI recommendation quality, and governance compliance. It concludes that AMRO-DIGF should be evaluated through digital-twin simulation, expert review, and longitudinal case comparison before any claim of causal performance improvement is made.
1. International Air Transport Association. Digital Aircraft Operations. Montreal: IATA; 2026. Available from: https://www.iata.org/en/programs/ops-infra/techops/digital-aircraft-operations/
2. European Union Aviation Safety Agency. Artificial Intelligence Roadmap 2.0: A human-centric approach to AI in aviation. Cologne: EASA; 2023.
3. Federal Aviation Administration. 14 CFR Part 145: Repair Stations. Washington (DC): Federal Aviation Administration; 2026. Available from: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-H/part-145
4. European Union Aviation Safety Agency. Easy Access Rules for Continuing Airworthiness, including Part-145 maintenance organisation approvals. Cologne: EASA; 2025.
5. National Institute of Standards and Technology. Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). NIST AI 100-1. Gaithersburg (MD): NIST; 2023.
6. International Organization for Standardization. ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Information technology - Artificial intelligence - Management system. Geneva: ISO; 2023.
7. Component Control. Quantum Control aviation software for the aviation aftermarket, including MRO, parts and logistics, manufacturing, and aircraft services. San Diego (CA): Component Control; 2026. Available from: https://www.componentcontrol.com/
8. Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S. Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly; 28(1):75-105, 2004.
9. Peffers K, Tuunanen T, Rothenberger MA, Chatterjee S. A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems; 24(3):45-77, 2007.
10. Gregor S, Hevner AR. Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Quarterly; 37(2):337-355, 2013.
11. Pavlyuk D, Alomar I. Artificial intelligence technologies for aircraft maintenance: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management; 17(1), 2026. doi:10.36001/ijphm.2026.v17i1.4567.
12. Kabashkin I, Perekrestov V, Pivovar M. AI-driven fault detection and maintenance optimization for aviation technical support systems. Processes; 13(3):666, 2025. doi:10.3390/pr13030666.
13. Shukla A, Bansal N. AI prognostics for aircraft fleet management: A strategic framework for operational efficiency and ROI. International Journal of Applied Mathematics; 38(4s):1363-1373, 2025. doi:10.12732/ijam.v38i4s.694.
14. MoghadasNian S, NaserPour Asiabari M, HeidariYekta A. AISA-L: An agentic AI strategy architecture for real-time KPI orchestration in sustainable, resilient airline logistics. SSRN; 2025. doi:10.2139/ssrn.6025895.
15. MoghadasNian SAH, Kashian H. AI strategy agent for airline logistics: A multi-layered, KPI-governed architecture for real-time optimization and ethical orchestration. 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in the Age of Digital Transformation. Zenodo; 2025. doi:10.5281/zenodo.18184458.
16. MoghadasNian SAH, Sarvi N. Enhancing MRO efficiency and effectiveness in the airline industry: A strategic approach to KPI-driven management. 9th International Conference on Interdisciplinary Studies in Management & Engineering. Zenodo; 2024. doi:10.5281/zenodo.19674936.
17. MoghadasNian SAH, MahMoudy M. Airline logistics AI performance framework: A 360-degree, multi-layered KPI approach for safety, sustainability, efficiency, and innovation. 20th Iranian International Industrial Engineering Conference. Zenodo; 2025. doi:10.5281/zenodo.18251742.
18. MoghadasNian SAH, MahMoudy M. Stock control in airline logistics: AI-driven inventory optimization for spare parts. 3rd International Conference on Recent Advances in Engineering, Innovation and Technology. Zenodo; 2025. doi:10.5281/zenodo.18372296.
19. MoghadasNian SAH. AI-driven inventory optimization in airline logistics: Enhancing efficiency, sustainability, and operational performance. SSRN; 2025. doi:10.2139/ssrn.6119086.
20. MoghadasNian SAH. AI-powered predictive maintenance in aviation operations. SSRN; 2025. doi:10.2139/ssrn.6117408.
21. MoghadasNian SAH. Digital transformation in airline logistics: Enhancing operational efficiency through AI-driven predictive analytics and blockchain integration. SSRN; 2025. doi:10.2139/ssrn.6129506.
22. MoghadasNian S, Rajol M, HosseinZadehShirazi Z. Strategic transformation through data governance: Leveraging Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) in the airline industry. 2nd International Conference on Engineering and Information Technology. Zenodo; 2024. doi:10.5281/zenodo.18728867.
23. MoghadasNian SAH, RoshanSourat A. Enhancing airline maintenance efficiency: A KPI-driven framework for production control. 8th National Conference on Interdisciplinary Research in Engineering and Management. Zenodo; 2024. doi:10.5281/zenodo.19949130.
24. Myllyaho L, Raatikainen M, Mannisto T, Mikkonen T, Nurminen JK. Systematic literature review of validation methods for AI systems. Journal of Systems and Software; 181:111050, 2021. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2021.111050.
25. Cummins L, Sommers A, Bakhtiari Ramezani S, Mittal S, Jabour J, Seale M, Rahimi S. Explainable predictive maintenance: A survey of current methods, challenges and opportunities. arXiv; 2024. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2401.07871.
