Эта статья является препринтом и не была отрецензирована.
О результатах, изложенных в препринтах, не следует сообщать в СМИ как о проверенной информации.
Aviation AI Conscience Governance 360 A Design-Science Framework for Accountable, Safety-Critical and Data-Governed Airline AI
Artificial intelligence (AI) is moving from experimental analytics into operational airline decision pathways, including operations control, predictive maintenance, disruption recovery, crew planning, passenger communication, revenue management, safety analytics, procurement and maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) logistics. The governance problem is therefore no longer whether AI can support airline performance, but whether AI-enabled recommendations remain safe, lawful, explainable, data-qualified, ethically defensible, economically justified and human-accountable. This article develops Aviation AI Conscience Governance 360 (AICG-360) as a design-science framework for accountable airline AI. The framework treats conscience not as machine morality, but as an executive governance architecture linking evidence, data quality, decision authority, risk thresholds, legal obligations, ethical constraints, economic value and post-decision learning. Drawing on aviation AI guidance, risk-management standards, data-quality models, design-science research and KPI-driven airline governance literature, the paper proposes eight governance dimensions: safety conscience, data conscience, model conscience, human-authority conscience, legal-compliance conscience, ethical conscience, economic-value conscience and institutional-learning conscience. It further specifies decision gates, escalation triggers, KPI domains, accountability roles and dashboard logic for airline boards, accountable managers, safety leaders, CIOs, CDOs, operations executives and compliance officers. The article contributes by reframing airline AI governance as auditable decision execution rather than isolated compliance, model validation or productivity automation; by operationalizing data quality as the epistemic foundation of responsible AI; and by offering a publishable artifact for future Delphi validation, case-study testing and dashboard prototyping.
1. European Union Aviation Safety Agency. Artificial Intelligence Roadmap 2.0: A human-centric approach to AI in aviation. Cologne: European Union Aviation Safety Agency; 2023.
2. European Union Aviation Safety Agency. Artificial Intelligence Concept Paper Issue 2: Guidance for Level 1 and Level 2 machine-learning applications. Cologne: European Union Aviation Safety Agency; 2024.
3. European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Artificial Intelligence Act. Brussels: European Union; 2024.
4. National Institute of Standards and Technology. Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). Gaithersburg (MD): U.S. Department of Commerce; 2023.
5. SITA. Air Transport IT Insights 2025. Geneva: SITA; 2025.
6. International Civil Aviation Organization. Artificial intelligence contribution to aviation. ICAO Assembly, 42nd Session, Working Paper. Montreal: International Civil Aviation Organization; 2025.
7. Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S. Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly; 28(1): 75-105, 2004.
8. Peffers K, Tuunanen T, Rothenberger MA, Chatterjee S. A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems; 24(3): 45-77, 2007.
9. Gregor S, Hevner AR. Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Quarterly; 37(2): 337-355, 2013.
10. Trist EL, Bamforth KW. Some social and psychological consequences of the Longwall method of coal-getting. Human Relations; 4(1): 3-38, 1951.
11. Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM. Managing the unexpected: Sustained performance in a complex world (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2015.
12. Reason J. Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Aldershot: Ashgate; 1997.
13. Parasuraman R, Riley V. Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors; 39(2): 230-253, 1997.
14. International Organization for Standardization. ISO/IEC 23894:2023 Artificial intelligence - Guidance on risk management. Geneva: ISO; 2023.
15. International Organization for Standardization. ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial intelligence - Management system. Geneva: ISO; 2023.
16. International Organization for Standardization. ISO/IEC 25012:2008 Software engineering - Software product quality requirements and evaluation - Data quality model. Geneva: ISO; 2008.
17. DAMA International. DAMA-DMBOK: Data management body of knowledge (2nd ed.). Basking Ridge (NJ): Technics Publications; 2017.
18. International Air Transport Association. Exploring artificial intelligence and digital identity use cases in aviation. Montreal/Geneva: International Air Transport Association; 2025.
19. MoghadasNian SAH. Digital transformation and AI in airline management: Aligning agility, innovation, and data-driven strategies. SSRN; 2025. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6137987
20. MoghadasNian SAH. AI-powered predictive maintenance in aviation operations. SSRN; 2025. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6117408
21. MoghadasNian SAH. Human-centric AI integration in airline operations: Enhancing safety, efficiency, and workforce resilience. SSRN; 2025. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6099266
22. MoghadasNian SAH. Generative AI for aviation maintenance: Optimizing predictive analytics through strategic prompt engineering and hybrid human-AI collaboration. SSRN; 2025. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6072392
23. MoghadasNian SAH, Manafi F. Elevating airline performance with data analytics: A strategic guide to key performance indicators. SSRN; 2024. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6236539
24. MoghadasNian S, Naserpour Asiabari M, Heidari Yekta A. AISA-L: An agentic AI strategy architecture for real-time KPI orchestration in sustainable, resilient airline logistics. SSRN; 2025. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6025895
25. Moghadasnian SAH, Kashian H. Agentic AI in Airline Management: A KPI-governed architecture for trust-based autonomy, strategic co-leadership, and operational excellence. SSRN; 2025. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6033194
26. MoghadasNian SAH. Digital transformation in airline logistics: Enhancing operational efficiency through AI-driven predictive analytics and blockchain integration. SSRN; 2025. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6129506
27. MoghadasNian SAH. AI-driven inventory optimization in airline logistics: Enhancing efficiency, sustainability, and operational performance. SSRN; 2025. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6119086
28. MoghadasNian SAH, GhajarGar F. AI-powered passenger experience in airlines: A KPI-driven framework with mixed-methods evidence. SSRN; 2025. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6017454
