Эта статья является препринтом и не была отрецензирована.
О результатах, изложенных в препринтах, не следует сообщать в СМИ как о проверенной информации.
Ziyarat Nahiya as Witness-Memory and Anti-Forgetting Architecture in Ashura Remembrance
This article analyses Ziyarat Nahiya as a witness-based, embodied, named and anti-forgetting memory architecture within Ashura remembrance. The primary research question asks how the text transforms Ashura from a general symbol of victimhood into witness-based, embodied, named and anti-forgetting memory. Using a qualitative, source-critical textual and reception design, the study treats Ziyarat Nahiya as a received Shii liturgical witness text whose ritual and mnemonic functions can be analysed without making unrestricted claims about attribution, isnad certainty or direct historical reporting. Ziyarat Shuhada is integrated as a supporting named-martyr memory module, while Ziyarat Rajabiyya is used cautiously as a seasonal companion-memory support. The findings show six linked functions: detail prevents symbolic flattening; the martyr’s body becomes a carrier of embodied ritual memory; naming transforms martyrs from anonymous collectivity into responsibility-bearing memory; companion memory extends beyond Muharram; remembered suffering becomes anti-forgetting and justice expectation; and source-critical boundaries protect the analysis from overclaiming. The article contributes to Shii studies, cultural memory studies, ritual studies and martyrdom studies by proposing the construct of Witness-Memory and Anti-Forgetting Architecture. It also offers a non-reductionist methodological boundary: sacred truth, sincerity, divine acceptance, thawab, wilayah and the metaphysical rank of Imam al-Husayn are not measured; only textual reception, ritual function, public memory, translation, pedagogy and ethical responsibility are academically analysed.
1. MoghadasNian SAH. Ziyarat Ashura as a holistic covenantal loop: Responsible mourning, ethical dissociation from injustice, and present moral accountability. 2026.
2. MoghadasNian SAH. Ziyarat Warith as a prophetic inheritance-legitimacy cycle: From Karbala to the history of guidance, imamate, and human dignity. 2026.
3. Fūʾādiyān MR. Sīrī dar Ziyārat Nāḥiyah Muqaddasah [A survey of Ziyarat Nahiya Muqaddasah]. Pajoohe.ir; 2018/1397 SH.
4. Shīrāzī AH. Dar maḥḍar-i Ziyārat Nāḥiyah [In the presence of Ziyarat Nahiya]. Mawʿūd; 2, 1997/1376 SH.
5. Ibn al-Mashhadī M ibn J. al-Mazār al-Kabīr. Qayyūmī Iṣfahānī J, editor. Qom: Islamic Publications Office; 1998/1419 AH.
6. al-Majlisī MB. Biḥār al-Anwār. Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Wafāʾ; 1983/1403 AH.
7. Eḥsānīfar Langarūdī M. Iʿtibār-i sanadī-yi ziyārat-hā-yi Nāḥiyah Muqaddasah [The chain validity of the sacred Nahiya visitations]. ʿUlūm-i Ḥadīth; 8(4): 32–67, 2003/1382 SH.
8. Halbwachs M. On collective memory. Coser LA, editor and translator. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1992.
9. Assmann J. Collective memory and cultural identity. New German Critique; 65: 125–133, 1995.
10. Assmann J. Communicative and cultural memory. In: Erll A, Nünning A, editors. Cultural memory studies: An international and interdisciplinary handbook. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter; 2008. pp. 109–118.
11. Connerton P. How societies remember. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989.
12. Ricoeur P. Memory, history, forgetting. Blamey K, Pellauer D, translators. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2004.
13. al-Mūsawī al-Gharīfī M. Qawāʿid al-ḥadīth. Beirut: Dār al-Aḍwāʾ; 1986/1406 AH.
14. al-Khūʾī AS. Muʿjam rijāl al-ḥadīth. Vol. 1. Qom: Markaz Nashr Āthār al-Shīʿah; 1993/1372 SH.
15. Yūsufī Gharawī MH. Guzārish-i nishast-i barrasī-yi taḥlīlī-yi sīr-i maqtal-negārī-yi ʿĀshūrā [Report of the analytical session on the development of Ashura maqtal writing]. Kitāb Māh-i Dīn; 199: 97–104, 2014/1393 SH.
16. Ṭabasī N. Ziyārat Nāḥiyah Muqaddasah [Ziyarat Nahiya Muqaddasah]. Intiẓār; 20: 194–209, 2007/1386 SH.
17. Ibn Ṭāwūs AM. Miṣbāḥ al-zāʾir. Qom: Āl al-Bayt Institute; 1996/1417 AH.
18. Ranjbar M. A study on Nahiya and Rajabiya Ziyarats [Pazhūhishī dar bārah-yi do ziyārat Nāḥiyah wa Rajabiyyah]. Islamic History Studies; 7(26): 53–72, 2015/1394 SH.
19. IslamQuest and Andishe Qom. Ziyārat Nāḥiyah Muqaddasah: validity, source and devotional reception [Persian online answer/article].
20. Mahdīpūr AA. Reception-historical discussion of the two Nāḥiyah visitations and martyr-name transmission [Persian source; full bibliographic details require completion from the Arabic/Persian source dossier].
21. Assmann J. Cultural memory and early civilization: Writing, remembrance, and political imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
22. Turner V. The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Chicago: Aldine; 1969.
23. Bell C. Ritual theory, ritual practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992.
24. Ayoub MM. Redemptive suffering in Islam: A study of the devotional aspects of Ashura in Twelver Shiʿism. The Hague: Mouton; 1978.
25. Aghaie KS. The martyrs of Karbala: Shiʿi symbols and rituals in modern Iran. Seattle: University of Washington Press; 2004.
26. Halm H. Shiʿa Islam: From religion to revolution. Princeton: Markus Wiener Publishers; 1997.
27. Momen M. An introduction to Shiʿi Islam: The history and doctrines of Twelver Shiʿism. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1985.
28. Pinault D. The Shiites: Ritual and popular piety in a Muslim community. New York: St. Martin’s Press; 1992.
29. Chelkowski PJ, editor. Taʿziyeh: Ritual and drama in Iran. New York: New York University Press; 1979.
30. Deeb L. An enchanted modern: Gender and public piety in Shiʿi Lebanon. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2006.
31. Fischer MMJ. Iran: From religious dispute to revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1980.
32. Nakash Y. An attempt to trace the origin of the rituals of Ashura. Die Welt des Islams; 33(2): 161–181, 1993.
33. Hyder SAA. Reliving Karbala: Martyrdom in South Asian memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
