Developing students' skills of identifying reliable scientific sources: how to avoid fake information

Valeria  Vasilyeva,Anatoly  Shilov

ПРЕПРИНТ

Эта статья является препринтом и не была отрецензирована.
О результатах, изложенных в препринтах, не следует сообщать в СМИ как о проверенной информации.

Developing students' skills of identifying reliable scientific sources: how to avoid fake information

V. Vasilyeva,

A. Shilov

2021-09-27

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide modes of teaching Russian undergraduate students fundamental critical analysis of scientific papers and ways of identifying misinformation and disinformation in “Academic Writing” module. Design/methodology/approach “Academic Writing” module was taught to first-year undergraduate students at the North-West Institute of Management of the Presidential Academy (NWIM RANEPA, Russia). At a starting period students were asked to complete a questionnaire and perform a test, and then write an essay to identify how students were able to assess Web scientific literature and verify their “tolerance” to inaccurate and fake scientific information. Then contact hours on theory and practice of identifying and assessing information were introduced into the curriculum. At the end of the semester lists of works cited in original essays and final assays were compared. Besides, “double-blind peer-reviewing” role play was used to appraise coursemates’ text evaluation skills. Findings The findings reveal that entirely all first year undergraduate students lack the ability to differentiate between qualitative certain scientific information and misinformation and disinformation, and they willingly borrow anything from the Web. However, students acquired necessary skills to assess information critically using socio-technical systems infrastructures. This was demonstrated with list of literature analysis in students’ essays and peer-checking. Originality It is headline news and social networks when it is necessary to distinguish from authentic and inaccurate information. However, skills of critical assessment of scientific publications are of vital importance at a starting period of studies. In publications of that sort falsifications, fabrications and other fake discoveries can lead to reputational and financial risks, and then trigger unethical demeanour of future researchers. Practical implications The results of the paper can be used for teaching in university curriculum. Embedding information literacy and academic writing as well as involving information resources into students’ curriculum are aimed at the ability to identify misinformation and disinformation. Authors-developed "Academic writing" module component might be introduced into curriculum as a self-contained short course or a composing element of any students' academic discipline. All this mitigate the risks of applying low-equality, unverified and openly fake information in educational and scientific works.

Ссылка для цитирования:

Vasilyeva V., Shilov A. 2021. Developing students' skills of identifying reliable scientific sources: how to avoid fake information. PREPRINTS.RU. https://doi.org/

Список литературы

1. Allcott, H. and Gentzkow, M. (2017), "Nber Working Paper Series Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election", Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 31 No 2, pp. 211–236.

2. Auberry, K. (2018), "Increasing students’ ability to identify fake news through information literacy education and content management systems", The Reference Librarian, Vol. 59 No 4, pp. 179–187. doi: 10.1080/02763877.2018.1489935.

3. Bazanova, E. and Korotkina, I. (2017), "Russian Writing Centers Consortium", Higher Education in Russia, Vol. 211 No 4, pp. 50–57. (In Russ.)

4. Cabanac, G., Labbé, C. and Magazinov, A. (2021), "Tortured phrases: A dubious writing style emerging in science. Evidence of critical issues affecting established journal", available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.06751 (accessed 25 July 2021).

5. Christopher, J. (2021), "The raw truth about paper mills", FEBS Lett, No 595, p. 1751. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.14143.

6. Conroy, N. J., Rubin, V. L. and Chen, Y. (2015), "Automatic deception detection: methods for finding fake news", Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 52 No 1, pp. 1–4.

7. Eldermire, E. R. B. et al. (2019), "Information seeking and evaluation: A multi-institutional survey of veterinary students", Journal of the Medical Library Association, Vol. 107 No 4, pp. 515–526. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2019.674.

8. Esisi, M. (2007), "Journal clubs", BMJ, Vol. 335 No 7623, p. s138. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39337.722917.7D.

9. Faix, A. (2014), "Assisting students to identify sources: An investigation", Library Review, No 63, pp. 624–636. doi: 10.1108/LR-07-2013-0100.

10. Ferenc, J. et al. (2018), "Intentionally flawed manuscripts as means for teaching students to critically evaluate scientific papers", Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, Vol. 46 No 1, pp. 22–30. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21084.

11. Fisher, L. (2021), "Erratum: Elevation of USP4 antagonizes oxygen glucose deprivation/reoxygenation-evoked microglia activation and neuroinflammation-mediated neurotoxicity: Via the TRAF6-NF-kB signaling (RSC Advances (2019) 9 (23916–23924) DOI: 10.1039/C9RA03614H)", RSC Advances. Royal Society of Chemistry, Vol. 11 No 8, p. 4374. doi: 10.1039/d1ra90021h.

12. Fong, C. J. et al. (2017), "A meta-analysis on critical thinking and community college student achievement", Thinking Skills and Creativity. Elsevier, No 26 (June), pp. 71–83. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2017.06.002.

13. Gelder, T. van (2005), "Teaching Critical Thinking: Some Lessons From Cognitive Science", College Teaching, Vol. 53 No 1, pp. 41–48. doi: 10.3200/CTCH.53.1.41-48.

14. Giri, V. and Paily, M. U. (2020), "Effect of Scientific Argumentation on the Development of Critical Thinking", Science and Education, Vol. 29 No 3, pp. 673–690. doi: 10.1007/s11191-020-00120-y.

15. Green, B. (2012), Literacy in 3D: An Integrated Perspective in Theory and Practice, Edited by C. Beaves. Camberwell: ACER Press.

16. Hanz, K. and Kingsland, E. S. (2020), "Fake or for real? A fake news workshop", Reference Services Review, Vol. 48 No 1, pp. 91–112. doi: 10.1108/RSR-09-2019-0064.

17. Ince, S., Hoadley, C. and Kirschner, P. A. (2019), "The role of libraries in teaching doctoral students to become information-literate researchers: A review of existing practices and recommendations for the future", Information and Learning Science, Vol. 120 No. 3–4, pp. 158–172. doi: 10.1108/ILS-07-2018-0058.

18. Inouye, K. and Mills, D. (2021), "Fear of the academic fake? Journal editorials and the amplification of the “predatory publishing” discourse", Learned Publishing, Vol. 34 No 3, pp. 396–406. doi: 10.1002/leap.1377.

19. Karim, A. A. (1975), "Unshielding the sun. Human effects", Environment, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 6–14.

20. Keys, A. (1995), "Mediterranean diet and public health: personal reflections", The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 61 No. 6, pp. 1321S-1323S.

21. Korotkina, I. (2018), Models of training in the academic writing. Foreign and domestic experiences, Yurayt, Moscow. (In Russ.)

22. Koshkarova, N. N. (2018), "Fake News: Creative or Fraudulent?", Bulletin of Tomsk State Pedagogical University, Vol. 191 No. 2, pp. 14–18. doi: 10.23951/1609-624X-2018-2-14-18. (In Russ.)

23. Kumar, S. and Shah, N. (2018), "False Information on Web and Social Media: A Survey", Vol. 1 No. 1, available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1804.08559 (accessed 12 August 2021).

24. Ky, P. (2012), "Qualifications, Weight of Opinion, Peer Review and Methodology: A Framework for Understanding the Evaluation of Science in Merits Review", Journal of Environmental Law, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 207–251. doi: 10.1093/jel/eqs002.

25. Leung, J. S. C. (2020), "Students’ adherences to epistemic understanding in evaluating scientific claims", Science Education, Vol. 104 No. 2, pp. 164–192. doi: 10.1002/sce.21563.

26. Lindsay, J., Pluckrose, H. and Boghossian, P. (2018), "Academic Grievance Studies and the Corruption of Scholarship", Areo, available at: https://areomagazine.com/2018/10/02/academic-grievance-studies-and-the-corruption-of-scholarship/ (accessed 21 July 2021).

27. Loertscher, D. V. (2017), "Fake news, a rant, and new standards", Teacher Librarian, Vol. 44 No. 4, pp. 44–45.

28. Matteson, M. L. and Gersch, B. (2019), "Unique or ubiquitous: information literacy instruction outside academia", Reference Services Review, Vol. 47 No. 1, pp. 73–84. doi: 10.1108/RSR-12-2018-0075.

29. Melikhova, L. G. (2017), "The landscape of the magazine fake according to the “Dissertationopedia of magazines", Troitskiy variant – nauka, No. 238, pp. 10–11, available at: https://trv-science.ru/2017/09/landshaft-zhurnalnogo-fejka-po-dannym-disseropedii-zhurnalov (accessed 28 July 2021). (In Russ).

30. Nightingale, S. J., Wade, K. A. and Watson, D. G. (2017), "Can people identify original and manipulated photos of real-world scenes?", Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, Vol. 2 No. 1. doi: 10.1186/s41235-017-0067-2.

31. Niu, L., Behar-Horenstein, L. S. and Garvan, C. W. (2013), "Do instructional interventions influence college students’ critical thinking skills? A meta-analysis", Educational Research Review. Elsevier Ltd, No. 9, pp. 114–128. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2012.12.002.

32. Ottonicar, S. L. C. et al. (2021), "Fake news, big data and risks for democracy: New challenges for the information and media competence | Fake news, big data e o risco à democracia: Novos desafios à competência em informação e midiática", Ibersid, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 63–74.

33. Puig, B., Blanco-Anaya, P. and Pérez-Maceira, J. J. (2021), "Fake News" or Real Science? Critical Thinking to Assess Information on COVID-19", Frontiers in Education, No. 6 (March 2020), pp. 1–10. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2021.646909.

34. Quin, R. (2017), Collins 2017 word of the year shortlist, available at: www.collinsdictionary.com/word-lovers-blog/new/collins-2017-word-of-the-year-shortlist,396,HCB.html (accessed 12 August 2021).

35. El Rayess, M. et al. (2018), "Fake news judgement: The case of undergraduate students at Notre Dame University-Louaize, Lebanon", Reference Services Review, Vol. 46 No. 1, pp. 146–149. doi: 10.1108/RSR-07-2017-0027.

36. Richards, M. (2021), "Is “just googling it” good enough for first-year students?", College and Undergraduate Libraries. doi: 10.1080/10691316.2021.1894295.

37. Schwartz, J. (2018), "Visual literacy: academic libraries address 21st century challenges", Reference Services Review, Vol. 46 No. 4, pp. 479–499. doi: 10.1108/RSR-04-2018-0048.

38. Seng, C., Carlon, M. K. J. J. and Cross, J. S. (2020), "Information literacy training effectiveness on Cambodia’s province-based undergraduates", International Journal of Comparative Education and Development, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 263–280. doi: 10.1108/IJCED-11-2019-0057.

39. Sternin, I. A. and Shecterina, A. M. (2020), Fake markers in media texts: work manerials, Voronezh, OOO ‘Ritm’. (In Russ.)

40. Sukhodolov, A. P. (2017), "The phenomenon of “fake news” in the modern media space", in Eurasian Cooperation: Humanitarian Aspects: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, Irkutsk, Baykal state university, pp. 93–112.

41. Vasilyeva, V. and Vasilyeva, V. (2019), "Use of e-resources by unmotivated students: a success story from a library in Russia", Information and Learning Science, Vol. 120 No. 11–12. doi: 10.1108/ILS-06-2019-0056.

42. Walsh, M. J. (2010), "Librarians and controlling disinformation: is multi‐literacy instruction the answer?", Library Review, Vol. 59 No. 7, pp. 498–511.

43. Webster, K. (2021), RSC paper mill retractions, RSC Advances Blog, available at: https://blogs.rsc.org/ra/2021/01/21/rsc-paper-mill-retractions/?doing_wp_cron=1611230128.9542400836944580078125&_ga=2.252560841.1342994181.1628533116-177548972.1628533116, (accessed 7 August 2021).

44. Whiley, D. et al. (2017), "Enhancing critical thinking skills in first year environmental management students: a tale of curriculum design, application and reflection", Journal of Geography in Higher Education. Routledge, Vol. 41 No. 2, pp. 166–181. doi: 10.1080/03098265.2017.1290590.

45. World Health Organization (WHO) (2020), "Managing the COVID-19 Infodemic: Promoting Healthy Behaviours and Mitigating the Harm from Misinformation and Disinformation", available at: https://www.who.int/news/item/23-09-2020-managing-the-covid-19-infodemic-promoting-healthy-behaviours-and-mitigating-the-harm-from-misinformation-and-disinformation, (accessed 1 August 2021).

ПРЕПРИНТ

ИНФОРМАЦИЯ