Measuring Unity: A KPI-Governed Performance Architecture (UCTA-PA) for Civilizational Rapprochement and Governance-Grade Benchmarking

SeyyedAbdolHojjat  MoghadasNian,Mahdi  Farmanian,SeyedMehdi  AlizadehMousavi,SeyedMohammadMahdi  HosseinPoor,Akbar  Bagheri

ПРЕПРИНТ

Эта статья является препринтом и не была отрецензирована.
О результатах, изложенных в препринтах, не следует сообщать в СМИ как о проверенной информации.

Measuring Unity: A KPI-Governed Performance Architecture (UCTA-PA) for Civilizational Rapprochement and Governance-Grade Benchmarking

S. MoghadasNian,

M. Farmanian,

S. AlizadehMousavi,

S. HosseinPoor,

A. Bagheri

2026-02-13

https://doi.org/10.24108/preprints-3114492

This study operationalizes the Unified Civilizational Theological Architecture as a governance-grade performance system (UCTA-PA) that translates theological and institutional constructs into auditable key performance indicators. The artifact comprises 280 indicators 140 Crisis Warning Indicators (CWIs) and 140 Strategic Progress Indicators (SPIs) tagged to Layered Causal Analysis (events, systems, discourses, myths) and rolled into a transparent Unity Civilizational Maturity Index (UCMI). A mixed-methods, design-science approach was used: expert interviews and Delphi panels elicited constructs, thresholds, and ownership; structured surveys and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) derived weights (CR ≤ 0.10); exploratory/confirmatory factor analyses and unobserved-components models validated structure and dynamics; and AI-assisted content analysis enabled narrative-risk detection. Results show that CWI trigger grammars (z-score/95th percentile exceedance with escalation playbooks) surface near-term divergence, while SPI target grammars (12–24-month horizons with non-compensatory floors) produce measurable, domain-specific gains. Weight caps and robustness checks (alternative normalizations and stakeholder-statistical weighting) prevent domain dominance and stabilize UCMI rankings. Sectoral pilots demonstrate practical value: in airline management, integrations with PSS/DCS/OCC/MRO streams support security-narrative sensing and link technology adoption to OTP/NPS; in health tourism, ethics and service-quality SPIs, plus rumor-control CWIs, enhance capacity planning and risk communication. The study contributes a replicable construct-to-metric pathway and offers actionable governance hooks for policy dashboards, funding gates, and quasi-experimental evaluation (DiD/ITS).

Ссылка для цитирования:

MoghadasNian S., Farmanian M., AlizadehMousavi S., HosseinPoor S., Bagheri A. 2026. Measuring Unity: A KPI-Governed Performance Architecture (UCTA-PA) for Civilizational Rapprochement and Governance-Grade Benchmarking. PREPRINTS.RU. https://doi.org/10.24108/preprints-3114492

Список литературы

1. Adriansyah, G., & Hadi, P. S. (2024). Manajemen kinerja berbasis kpi di perguruan tinggi: integrasi balanced scorecard dan ipms. Journal of Industrial and Systems Optimization, 7(1), 74–81. https://doi.org/10.51804/jiso.v7i1.74-81

2. AlShami, A., Lotfi, A., & Coleman, S. (2012). Towards developing 3rd Generation Intelligent Synthetic Composite Indicators. UK Workshop on Computational Intelligence, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/UKCI.2012.6335759

3. Anheier, H. K. (2023). Advancing governance indicators: Four ways forward. Global Policy, 14(S4), 147–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13273

4. Anheier, H. K., Lang, M., & Knudsen, E. L. (2023). Introducing the Berggruen Governance Index I: Conceptual and methodological framework. Global Policy, 14(S4), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13278

5. Chmutova, I., Zhang, Q., Mazhuta, V., & Nimets, A. (2024). Formulating key performance indicators for an integrated enterprise management system using a sustainable development balanced scorecard. https://doi.org/10.31891/dsim-2024-6(43)

6. Huang, Y. (2025). A comparative study of performance management paradigms of OKRs and KPIs. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 56, 32–38. https://doi.org/10.54097/czpe6381

7. Kang, G.-C., & Kim, M.-J. (2014). Constructing the Composite Index using Unobserved Component Model and its Application. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society. The Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society. https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2014.15.1.220

8. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2012). Governance Matters III. The World Bank Economic Review. https://elibrary.worldbank.org.

9. Lawal, B., Cadet, E., Ajayi, J. O., Erigh, E. D., Obuse, E., Essien, I. A., & Ayanbode, N. (2025). Designing Foundational Governance Structures for Organizational Risk Visibility: A Systematic Review. Engineering and Technology Journal, 10(09). https://doi.org/10.47191/etj/v10i09.16

10. Lindén, D., Cinelli, M., Cinelli, M., Spada, M., Becker, W. E., Gasser, P., & Burgherr, P. (2021). A framework based on statistical analysis and stakeholders’ preferences to inform weighting in composite indicators. Environmental Modelling and Software, 145, 105208. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVSOFT.2021.105208

11. MoghadasNian, S. (2024a). Optimizing data governance and analytics strategies: A KPI-driven approach in the airline industry. 2nd International Conference on Engineering and Information Technology.

12. MoghadasNian, S. (2024b). Tourism 4.0 in Iran: Navigating the digital transformation for sustainable and inclusive growth. International Journal of Innovative Research in Humanities, 4(3), 77–84.

13. MoghadasNian, S. (2024c). Strategic and transformational excellence in the airline industry: Leveraging key performance indicators (KPIs). 4th International Conference on Management Studies, Culture & Art.

14. MoghadasNian, S. (2025a). UCTA‑PA: Unified Civilizational Theological Architecture: A Performance Architecture for Measurable Rapprochement and Civilizational Renewal. University of Religions and Denominations. University of Religions and Denominations. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16602.40647

15. MoghadasNian, S. (2025b). 7S-360 Strategic Indicator Architecture: A KPI-Governed Framework for Integrated Governance. University of Religions and Denominations (URD). DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15665.24160

16. MoghadasNian, S. (2025c). Integrated KPI Excellence Framework (IKEF-360+): A universal model for role-based airline performance management. Tarbiat Modares University. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392243060_Integrated_KPI_Excellence_Framework_IKEF-360 doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.17285.46562

17. MoghadasNian, S. (2025d). Digital transformation and AI in airline management: Aligning agility, innovation, and data-driven strategies. 3rd International Conference on Recent Advances in Engineering, Innovation and Technology.

18. MoghadasNian, S., & BeheshtiNia, F. (2024). Advancing airworthiness assurance in airlines: A KPI-driven framework for CAMO excellence. Transactions on Data Analysis in Social Science, 6(3), 1–10. ISSN 2821-1936.

19. MoghadasNian, S., & MahMoudy, M. (2025). Airline logistics AI performance framework: A 360-degree, multi-layered KPI approach for safety, sustainability, efficiency, and innovation. 20th Iranian International Industrial Engineering Conference.

20. MoghadasNian, S., & Manafi, F. (2024). Fortifying cybersecurity and enhancing data privacy in the airline industry: A strategic KPI-driven framework. 7th National Conference on Organization and Management Research.

21. Moghadasnian, S., & Mousavian, F. (2024). Optimizing airline revenue management through KPI-driven strategies: A comprehensive analysis of industry practices. The Scientific-Specialized Quarterly Journal of New Approaches in Management Sciences, 5(2), 350–358.

22. MoghadasNian, S., & Salehi, N. (2024). Optimizing airline sales and marketing strategies: A KPI-driven approach. 7th National Conference on Organization and Management Research.

23. MoghadasNian, S., & Sarvi, N. (2024). Strategic enhancement of airline maintenance operations: A KPI-driven approach for the chief line maintenance officer. Transactions on Machine Intelligence, 7(4), 131–140. ISSN 2821-1693.

24. Moghadasnian, S., Alizadeh Mousavi, S. M., Hosseinpoor, S. M. M., & Bagheri, A. (2025b). Operationalizing Islamic theological convergence: The Global Kalam Strategic Framework (GKSF) for data-driven intra-faith unity. 10th National Conference on Management, Economy & Islamic Science.

25. MoghadasNian, S., EbrahimNezhad, M., & Sohrabi, F. (2024a). Optimizing airline logistics stock control: The strategic role of key performance indicators (KPIs). 9th National Conference on Interdisciplinary Research in Engineering and Management.

26. MoghadasNian, S., JafarTayari Dehaqani, M., Taheri, J., Haghighi, N. and MoghadasNian, S.A.H. (2025a). Measuring Dialogue, Managing Unity: A KPI-Governed Performance Analysis of al-Murājaʿāt Using a Design-Science Approach. 14th National Interdisciplinary Research Conference in Management & Humanistic Sciences.

27. Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2016). For a New Generation of Objective Indicators in Governance and Corruption Studies. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 22(3), 363–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10610-016-9322-1

28. Nazmi, N., & Hassan, R. (2024). Measuring Shari’ah Governance Practices: The Development of Shari’ah Governance Practices Index (SGPi) for Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia. 1(1), 14–28. https://doi.org/10.37934/sijmaf.1.1.1428

29. Renn, O., & Klinke, A. (2012). Risk Governance: Concept and Application to Institutional Risk Management (pp. 17–36). Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4406-0_2

30. Trapnell, S. E. (2011). Actionable Governance Indicators: Turning Measurement into Reform. Hague Journal on The Rule of Law, 3(2), 317–348. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1876404511200095

ПРЕПРИНТ

ИНФОРМАЦИЯ

Использование куки-файлов