Эта статья является препринтом и не была отрецензирована.
О результатах, изложенных в препринтах, не следует сообщать в СМИ как о проверенной информации.
Elevating Airline Design and Production Excellence: A Strategic KPI Framework for DOA and POA Officers
This study delves into the development and application of a Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)-driven framework tailored for Design Organization Approval (DOA) and Production Organization Approval (POA) officers in the airline industry. It aims to elucidate how strategic alignment of KPIs with organizational objectives can significantly enhance the efficiency, compliance, and innovation in airline design and production processes. Employing a mixed-methods research approach, the study combines quantitative data analysis with qualitative insights from industry surveys, case studies, and direct observations. The findings reveal that a well-structured KPI framework not only optimizes operational processes but also fosters a culture of continuous improvement and strategic decision-making. By systematically analyzing various KPIs related to design and production efficiency, quality assurance, regulatory compliance, project management, innovation, supplier management, sustainability, and financial performance, the research underscores the pivotal role of KPIs in driving industry excellence. The study offers actionable insights for DOA and POA officers, suggesting the integration of KPIs into strategic planning and day-to-day operations as a means to navigate the complexities of modern aviation and achieve organizational goals. This research contributes to the existing body of knowledge by highlighting the multidimensional impact of KPIs and proposing a dynamic, adaptable framework for continuous operational enhancement in the highly regulated airline industry.
1. Martínez-Val, R., Palacin, J. F., & Perez, E. (2008). The evolution of jet airliners explained through the range equation. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 222, 915-919.
2. Lim, D., & Mavris, D. (2010). A Design Methodology for Lifelong Aircraft Evolution. AIAA.
3. Loftin, L. K. (2012). Quest for Performance: The Evolution of Modern Aircraft.
4. Jameson, A., & Ou, K. (2011). 50 years of transonic aircraft design. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 47, 308-318.
5. Krivoruchenko, V. (2017). Evolution of Automated Research Systems for Aircraft Aeromechanics. 2017 Fourth International Conference on Computer Technology in Russia and in the Former Soviet Union (SORUCOM), 71-74.
6. Geels, F. (2006). Co-evolutionary and multi-level dynamics in transitions: The transformation of aviation systems and the shift from propeller to turbojet (1930–1970). Technovation, 26, 999-1016.
7. Zhang, Z., Song, T., & Song, J. (2014). Analysis of Relationship between Quality Management System and Design Assurance System. Procedia Engineering, 80, 565-572.
8. Mohammed, A. R. (2016). Establishing Effective Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) as Part of Performance Measurement System in Airline Enterprises (Egypt Air: Case Study). International Journal of Heritage, Tourism, and Hospitality, 7.
9. Stricker, N., Minguillon, F. E., & Lanza, G. (2017). Selecting key performance indicators for production with a linear programming approach. International Journal of Production Research, 55, 5537-5549.
10. Kang, N., Zhao, C., Li, J., & Horst, J. (2016). A Hierarchical structure of key performance indicators for operation management and continuous improvement in production systems. International Journal of Production Research, 54, 6333-6350.
11. Ünal, V. Ö., Berkol, A., & Tartan, E. O. (2017). Using artificial intelligence based expert system for selection of design subcontractors: A case study in aerospace industry. 2017 8th International Conference on Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (ICMAE), 433-437.
