Эта статья является препринтом и не была отрецензирована.
О результатах, изложенных в препринтах, не следует сообщать в СМИ как о проверенной информации.
Chaos Is Relative: A Formal Principle of Framework Dependence in Complex Systems
2026-06-24
Scientific practice repeatedly encounters systems described as both chaotic and ordered,
producing persistent disputes across physics, neuroscience, and data science. This paper shows
that the contradiction is methodological rather than empirical. We formalize chaos and order
as properties relative to a descriptive framework and formulate the Law of Relativity of Chaos:
for any system, the appearance of chaos or regularity depends on choices of boundaries, scale,
observables, and encoding conventions, while some regularity remains unavoidable within any
fixed framework. We provide strengthened formal claims, clarify scope boundaries and edge
cases, and supply minimal computational validation on the logistic map, including entropy-rate
estimates and compression-based complexity proxies across explicit coarse-grainings. We further
state a quantitative, falsifiable scaling prediction for coarse-grained entropy in the Lorenz system,
and we demonstrate how explicit framework declaration dissolves a concrete scientific controversy
concerning whether brain dynamics are “chaotic.” The result is a unifying methodological
constraint for multiscale modeling and debate resolution in complex systems.
Ссылка для цитирования:
Kriger B. 2026. Chaos Is Relative: A Formal Principle of Framework Dependence in Complex Systems. PREPRINTS.RU. https://doi.org/10.24108/preprints-3115640
Список литературы
1. [1] C. G. Hempel, Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, Free Press, New York (1965).
2. [2] N. Cartwright, The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999).
3. [3] J.-P. Eckmann and D. Ruelle, Ergodic theory of chaos and strange attractors, Reviews of Modern Physics 57, 617–656 (1985).
4. [4] A. Katok and B. Hasselblatt, Introduction to the Modern Theory of Dynamical Systems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995).
5. [5] P. Walters, An Introduction to Ergodic Theory, Springer, New York (1982).
6. [6] E. N. Lorenz, Deterministic nonperiodic flow, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 20, 130–141 (1963).
7. [7] A. N. Kolmogorov, Three approaches to the quantitative definition of information, Problems of Information Transmission 1(1), 1–7 (1965).
8. [8] P. Martin-L¨of, The definition of random sequences, Information and Control 9, 602–619 (1966).
9. [9] A. A. Brudno, The complexity of the trajectories of a dynamical system, Russian Mathematical Surveys 33(1), 197–198 (1978).
10. [10] M. Li and P. Vit´anyi, An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications, 3rd ed., Springer, New York (2008).
11. [11] C. E. Shannon, A mathematical theory of communication, Bell System Technical Journal 27, 379–423 and 623–656 (1948).
12. [12] T. M. Cover and J. A. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory, 2nd ed., Wiley, Hoboken (2006).
13. [13] E. T. Jaynes, Information theory and statistical mechanics/
